C.L. v. State
Decision Date | 31 October 2012 |
Docket Number | No. 27A02–1203–JV–232.,27A02–1203–JV–232. |
Citation | 978 N.E.2d 756 |
Parties | C.L., Appellant–Respondent, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee–Petitioner. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from the Grant Superior Court; The Honorable Dana J. Kenworthy, Judge Pro Tempore; The Honorable Brian McLane, Magistrate; Cause No. 27D02–1201–JD–3.
Jerry T. Drook, Public Defender's Office, Marion, IN, Attorney for Appellant.
Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Jodi Kathryn Stein, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.
C.L. appeals the finding he committed an act that would be Class C felony battery if committed by an adult.1 As there was sufficient evidence to support his adjudication as a delinquent, we affirm.
On January 2, 2012, James Johnson arrived at the residence of Stephanie Horton, her husband, Tyrone Bloomfield, and her son, C.L. When Johnson arrived, Horton asked him if he had any money. Bloomfield then struck Johnson in the back of the head with a piece of metal and knocked him unconscious. When Johnson regained consciousness, C.L. was standing above him and punching him in the face repeatedly. C.L. continued to punch Johnson's face as Johnson left. Horton took Johnson to his house, where his niece called 911. The responding officer found Johnson face down and unconscious. Paramedics were able to revive Johnson with smelling salts, at which time Johnson identified C.L. and Bloomfield as his attackers. The police then arrested Bloomfield and C.L. Johnson no longer had money in his possession.
The State alleged C.L. was a delinquent for committing an act that would be Class C felony battery if committed by an adult. After a fact-finding hearing, the juvenile court found C.L. had committed the act, adjudicated him a delinquent, and placed him in the wardship of the Department of Correction.
C.L. challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his adjudication. When the State seeks to have a juvenile adjudicated a delinquent for committing an act that would be a crime if committed by an adult, the State must prove every element of that crime beyond a reasonable doubt. A.E.B v. State, 756 N.E.2d 536, 540 (Ind.Ct.App.2001). When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a juvenile adjudication, we neither reweigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of the witnesses. Id. We consider only “the evidence of probative value and the reasonable inferences that support the determination.” Id.
The State had to prove C.L. touched Johnson in a rude, insolent, or angry manner that resulted in serious bodily injury. Ind.Code § 35–42–2–1(a)(3). Serious bodily injury is “bodily injury that creates a substantial risk of death or that causes: (1) serious permanent disfigurement; (2) unconsciousness; (3) extreme pain; (4) permanent or protracted loss or...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Woods v. State
...978 N.E.2d 756Darrius WOODS, Appellant–Defendant,v.STATE of Indiana, Appellee–Plaintiff.No. 20A03–1202–CR–90.Court of Appeals of Indiana.Nov. 1, Appeal from the Elkhart Superior Court; The Honorable George W. Biddlecomb, Judge; Cause No. 20D03–0810–FA–50.Marielena Duerring, Duerring Law Off......
- Shipley v. State
-
Fleming v. State
...978 N.E.2d 756Brian S. FLEMING, Appellant–Defendant,v.STATE of Indiana, Appellee–Plaintiff.No. 82A05–1202–CR–100.Court of Appeals of Indiana.Nov. 1, Appeal from the Vanderburgh Circuit Court; The Honorable Kelli E. Fink, Magistrate; Cause No. 82C01–1107–FD–807.Erin L. Berger, Evansville, IN......