C. N. Paine & Co. v. Kohl

Decision Date01 July 1883
CitationC. N. Paine & Co. v. Kohl, 16 N.W. 824, 14 Neb. 580 (Neb. 1883)
PartiesC. N. PAINE & CO., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. CHARLES KOHL, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

ERROR to the district court for Adams county.Tried below before GASLIN, J.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Batty & Ragan, for plaintiff in error.

Dilworth & Smith, for defendant in error.

OPINION

COBB J.

This was an action by C. N. Paine & Co. against Chas. Kohl for the agreed price of a frame building alleged to have been sold by the former to the latter while standing on rollers in the street in the city of Hastings.The building was to be moved to and upon a certain lot of said city by C. N. Paine & Co. but there is a conflict of testimony as to whether it was or was not a part of the contract that C. N. Paine & Co. should, in addition to moving the building to and upon the lot of Kohl, also place it upon a good foundation.There is no conflict in the testimony that C. N. Paine & Co. did move the building to and upon the said lot, that it was not placed upon any foundation, and in that condition and shortly after its removal to and upon the said lot, it was destroyed by fire, which consumed a large portion of said city.

The jury to whom the cause was tried found their verdict in favor of the defendant.

The plaintiff who brings the cause to this court on error assigns sixteen grounds of error, but as we have come to the conclusion that there must be a new trial for error in the instructions of the court, the other errors assigned will not be examined.

Among the instructions given in charge by the court to the jury upon its own motion were the following:

2.If you find from the evidence that the plaintiffs moved said building upon defendant's lot, and had placed it in the position and upon the foundation that they were bound to do by...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Black River Lumber Co. v. Warner
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 19 Diciembre 1887
    ... ... Clarke v. Hammerle, ... 27 Mo. 55; Mead v. Brotherton, 30 Mo. 201; ... Sawyer v. Railroad, 37 Mo. 240; Paine v ... Kohl, 14 Neb. 580; Moss v. Green, 41 Mo. 390; ... Philibert v. Burber, 4 Mo.App. 470. (b) An ... instruction which assumes the ... ...
  • Western Wheeled Scraper Co. v. Sadilek
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 7 Enero 1897
    ...872; Jucker v. Chicago & N.W. R. Co. 8 N.W. [Wis.], 862; Dailey v. Linnehan, 40 N.W. [Minn.], 250; Park v. O'Brien, 23 Conn. 338; Paine v. Kohl, 14 Neb. 580.) was entitled to recover the amount claimed in the petition. (Frieberg v. Cody, 20 N.W. [Mich.], 813; Nebraska Nat. Bank v. Logan, 29......
  • Coad v. Read
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 10 Abril 1896
  • School District of Chadron v. Foster
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 10 Marzo 1891
    ...KINKAID, J. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Alfred Bartow, and George A. Eckles, for plaintiff in error, cited, as to the instructions: Paine v. Kohl, 14 Neb. 580; Eaton v. Carruth, 11 Id., 231; McPherson Wiswell, 19 Id., 117; as to the contract: State, ex rel. Carter, v. Sch. Dist., 22 Id., 48; Haz......
  • Get Started for Free