Caballero v. Premier Care Simi Valley LLC
Decision Date | 28 September 2021 |
Docket Number | 2d Civ. No. B308126 |
Parties | Miguel CABALLERO et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. PREMIER CARE SIMI VALLEY LLC, Defendant and Appellant. |
Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Lann G. McIntyre, Tracy D. Forbath, San Diego, Kathleen M. Walker and Jeffrey S. Healey, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.
Law Offices of Greg W. Garrotto, Greg W. Garrotto, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
Premier Care Simi Valley LLC dba Simi Valley Care Center (Premier Care) appeals from an order denying a petition to compel arbitration. Miguel Caballero, who declares he reads and writes only in Spanish, signed a two-page "RESIDENT-FACILITY ARBITRATION AGREEMENT" (Arbitration Agreement) when his mother, Maria Paz-Anaya Caballero, was admitted to Premier Care. The Arbitration Agreement is in English. Three years after signing the agreement Caballero and his siblings (plaintiffs) brought this wrongful death action against Premier Care and other defendants.
In denying Premier Care's petition to compel arbitration, the trial court found it had failed to sufficiently inform Caballero of the Arbitration Agreement's contents. The record, however, does not support this finding. A party who does not understand English sufficiently to comprehend the contents of a contract in that language is required to "have ... it read or explained to him." ( Ramos v. Westlake Services LLC (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 674, 687, 195 Cal.Rptr.3d 34 ( Ramos ).) The record confirms that Caballero signed the Arbitration Agreement notwithstanding his limited English skills and that neither Caballero nor any family member provided evidence of the circumstances surrounding the signing. The Premier Care representative, Stacy Elstein, also had no specific recollection of the transaction. Hence, there is no evidence that Caballero either requested assistance in understanding the document or was prevented from obtaining such assistance.
As the parties acknowledge, the Arbitration Agreement complies with the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 1295 for arbitration clauses in medical service contracts. Consequently, as a matter of public policy, the Arbitration Agreement "is not a contract of adhesion, nor unconscionable nor otherwise improper." (Id. , subd. (e); Bolanos v. Khalatian (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1586, 1590, 283 Cal.Rptr. 209 ( Bolanos ).) In the absence of any evidence that Caballero communicated his inability to read the Arbitration Agreement prior to signing it, the petition to compel arbitration should have been granted. We reverse.
Article 1 of the Arbitration Agreement provides:
The Arbitration Agreement further states in red print: "NOTICE: BY SIGNING THIS CONTRACT, YOU ARE AGREEING TO HAVE ANY ISSUE OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE DECIDED BY NEUTRAL ARBITRATION AND YOU ARE GIVING UP YOUR RIGHT TO A JURY OR
ARTICLE 1 OF THIS CONTRACT." The document also states in red print: Each "NOTICE" has a separate signature block.
Article 4 of the Arbitration Agreement advises that the "[a]greement to arbitrate is not a precondition for medical treatment or for admission to the Facility." By signing the agreement, however, Caballero "certifie[d] that [he] has read this Agreement, and has been given a copy, and is either the Resident, or is the representative of the Resident, duly authorized to execute the above and accepts its terms."
On November 17, 2019, Caballero's mother fell to the floor while she was being transferred by Premier Care's employees via an "Invacare" hydraulic patient lift and body sling. She was seriously injured and died later that day.
Plaintiffs filed this action against Premier Care, Invacare Corporation and Simi Investment Properties LTD, alleging causes of action for medical negligence, violations of the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act and product liability. Premier Care petitioned to compel binding arbitration pursuant to the Arbitration Agreement. Plaintiffs opposed the petition.
Caballero did not deny signing the Arbitration Agreement but declared: "My primary speaking, reading and writing language is Spanish; I cannot read English, nor can I understand spoken English except in a very limited sense." He further declared: "To my best recollection, during the time that my mother was admitted as a patient to [Premier Care], I was not presented nor did I sign a Resident-Facility Arbitration Agreement in Spanish nor was I presented with an Agreement in English that was explained to me."
In its reply, Premier Care submitted the declaration of Stacy Elstein, who had signed the Arbitration Agreement on its behalf. Elstein stated: Elstein did not "recall the resident or her legal representative having any questions about the Admission Agreement or the Arbitration Agreement prior to said documents being signed by [her] and the resident's representative."
The trial court denied the petition to compel arbitration, finding that Caballero, as a non-English speaking signatory to the Arbitration Agreement, was not sufficiently informed of what he was signing. The court noted that Elstein's practice was to have a Spanish speaking staff member read the agreement and explain it to the non-English speaking resident representative but found
Premier Care asserts that Caballero's signatures on the Arbitration Agreement objectively demonstrated his assent to the arbitration provisions and that the trial court erred by shifting the burden to Premier Care to demonstrate that Caballero understood what he was signing. Cabellero contends the order denying the motion to compel arbitration must be affirmed because "[t]there is no evidence that it was explained to [him] that he was being given an arbitration agreement to sign."
"The party seeking to compel arbitration has the burden of proving the existence of an enforceable arbitration agreement by a preponderance of the evidence, and a party opposing the petition bears the burden of proving by a preponderance any fact necessary to its defense." ( Baker v. Italian Maple Holdings LLC (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 1152, 1157, 220 Cal.Rptr.3d 887 ( Baker ).) ( Id. at p. 1158, 220 Cal.Rptr.3d 887.)
" " ( Mendez v. Mid-Wilshire Health Care Center (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 534, 541, 163 Cal.Rptr.3d 80.) "If the [trial] court's decision regarding arbitrability is based on resolution of disputed facts, we review the decision for substantial evidence." ( Baker , supra , 13 Cal.App.5th at p. 1158, 220 Cal.Rptr.3d 887.)
Caballero does not dispute that his signatures appear on the Arbitration Agreement. He contends there was no "mutual assent" to the agreement because he cannot not read English and therefore did not understand he was waiving his right to a jury or court trial.
In California, "[g]eneral principles of contract law determine whether the parties have entered a binding agreement to arbitrate." ( Craig v. Brown & Root, Inc. (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 416, 420, 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 818.) "An essential element of any contract is the consent of the parties, or mutual assent." ( Donovan v. RRL Corp. (2001) 26...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bixler v. Superior Court
... ... fact necessary to its defense. ( Caballero v. Premier Care ... Simi Valley LLC (2021) 69 ... ...
-
Birrueta v. UMA Enters.
... ... an agreement to arbitrate exists. (Caballero v. Premier ... Care Simi Valley LLC (2021) 69 ... ...
-
Man Na Tam v. KMS Auto.
... ... Mendoza v. Trans Valley Transport (2022) 75 ... Cal.App.5th 748, 777.) In ... it read or explained to him or her." ( Caballero v ... Premier Care Simi Valley LLC (2021) 69 ... ...
-
Nap Holdings, LLC v. China Elecs.
...69 Cal.App.5th 512, 517 (Caballero).) The party opposing arbitration bears the burden of proving any fact necessary to its stated defense. (Ibid.) trial court sits as a trier of fact, weighing the declarations and documentary evidence presented by the parties, as well as any oral testimony ......
-
Health Law Committee 2021 Appellate Litigation Update
...to execute a residential care facility's stand-alone arbitration agreement).Caballero v. Premier Care Simi Valley, LLC, 69 Cal. App. 5th 512 (2021) (A non-English speaker is bound by an English-language arbitration agreement unless he is prevented from obtaining assistance in understanding ......