Cabral v. Commissioner of Correction, No. 27929.
Decision Date | 27 May 2008 |
Docket Number | No. 27929. |
Citation | 946 A.2d 1278,108 Conn.App. 1 |
Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
Parties | John CABRAL v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. |
Mary Boehlert, special public defender, for the appellant (petitioner).
Stephen M. Carney, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Michael L. Regan, state's attorney, for the appellee (respondent).
BISHOP, McLACHLAN and HARPER, Js.
The petitioner, John Cabral, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he alleged that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. The petitioner claims that the court improperly determined that (1) trial counsel's failure to present testimony from him at a suppression hearing was not prejudicial to him and (2) trial counsel's failure to object to the admissibility of certain evidence at trial was not an instance of deficient representation. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
In 2000, a jury found the petitioner guilty of conspiracy to possess one kilogram or more of marijuana with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 21a-278(b) as well as attempt to possess one kilogram or more of marijuana with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49(a)(1) and 21a-278(b). The trial court rendered judgment in accordance with the verdict and sentenced the petitioner to a total effective term of imprisonment of eight years, suspended after six years, and five years probation.
The petitioner brought a direct appeal to this court, and this court reversed the judgment of conviction and remanded the case for a new trial. State v. Cabral, 75 Conn.App. 304, 815 A.2d 1234 (2003), rev'd, 275 Conn. 514, 881 A.2d 247, cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1048, 126 S.Ct. 773, 163 L.Ed.2d 600 (2005). After our Supreme Court granted the state's petition for certification to appeal, our Supreme Court reversed the judgment of this court and upheld the judgment of conviction. State v. Cabral, 275 Conn. 514, 517, 881 A.2d 247, cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1048, 126 S.Ct. 773, 163 L.Ed.2d 600 (2005).
Our Supreme Court summarized the facts that the jury reasonably could have found on the basis of the evidence presented at trial:
(Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Cabral, supra, 275 Conn. at 518-19, 881 A.2d 247.
In 2002, while awaiting the disposition of his direct appeal, the petitioner brought an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner alleged that his confinement was illegal because his trial counsel, John O'Brien, rendered ineffective assistance in many ways and thereby violated his due process right to a fair trial. Relevant to the claims raised on appeal, the petitioner alleged that O'Brien improperly "failed to present the testimony of witnesses with exculpatory testimony at pre-trial motions and trial, including but not limited to testimony of [the] [p]etitioner or others relative to [his] [m]otion to [s]uppress [evidence] dated June 28, 2000." The petitioner also alleged that O'Brien improperly "failed to properly object to hearsay evidence...." The respondent, the commissioner of correction, denied that the petitioner's confinement was illegal and, with regard to the petitioner's specific claims of ineffective assistance, left the petitioner to his proof.
Following a hearing, during which the court received evidence including testimony from the petitioner and O'Brien, the court issued a memorandum of decision denying the petition. The court subsequently granted the petition for certification to appeal; see General Statutes § 52-470(b); and this appeal followed.
Before turning to the two claims raised in this appeal, we first set forth the applicable principles of law and the legal standard that govern our review. "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall ... have the assistance of counsel for his defense." U.S. Const., amend. VI. "It has long been recognized that the right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel." McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771 n. 14, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1970).
(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Bowens v. Commissioner of Correction, 104 Conn.App. 738, 741-42, 936 A.2d 653 (2007), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 905, 944 A.2d 978 (2008).
"Turning to the prejudice component of the Strickland test, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ruiz v. Warden, CV–10–4003608 S.
...assistance claims of failing to file or pursue adequate motions to exclude admissions and confessions. Cabral v. Commissioner of Correction, 108 Conn.App. 1, 13–14, 946 A.2d 1278, cert. denied, 288 Conn. 915, 954 A.2d 183 (2008) ; see also Thergood v. Commissioner of Correction, 109 Conn.Ap......
-
Elsey v. Comm'r of Correction
... 10 A.3d 578 126 Conn.App. 144 Terance ELSEY v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. No. 31132. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued Sept. 24, 2010. Decided Jan. 18, ... likely have been different absent the errors." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Cabral v. Commissioner of Correction, 108 Conn.App. 1, 7, 946 A.2d 1278, cert. denied, 288 Conn. 915, 954 ... ...
-
State v. Stith, No. 27731.
... ... 543, 552, 869 A.2d 1281 (2005); see also Carey v. Commissioner of Correction, 86 Conn.App. 180, 185-86, 860 A.2d 776 (2004) (upholding ... ...
-
Douros v. Commissioner of Correction
... ... See Cabral v. Commissioner of Correction, 108 Conn. App. 1, 6-7, 946 A.2d 1278, cert. denied, 288 Conn. 915, 954 A.2d 183 (2008) ... Here, the ... ...