Cadle Co. v. Gasbusters Prod. I Ltd. P'ship, 2015-CA-000323-MR
Decision Date | 12 August 2016 |
Docket Number | NO. 2015-CA-000323-MR,2015-CA-000323-MR |
Citation | 509 S.W.3d 713 |
Parties | The CADLE COMPANY ; and The Cadle Company II, Inc., Appellants v. GASBUSTERS PRODUCTION I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; and FL-Gasbusters, Inc., Appellees |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
BRIEFS FOR APPELLANTS: Trevor W. Wells, Will E. Messer, Lexington, Kentucky
BRIEF FOR APPELLEES: Stephen P. Stoltz, Stefan J. Bing, Lexington, Kentucky
BEFORE: DIXON, NICKELL, AND VANMETER, JUDGES.
The doctrine of res judicata serves to preclude relitigation of claims which have been previously adjudicated. The issue we must decide in this case is whether the Lawrence Circuit Court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Gasbusters Production I Limited Partnership and its general partner, FL-Gasbusters, Inc. (hereinafter jointly "Gasbusters"), and against The Cadle Company ("Cadle") as a result of a bankruptcy judgment. We hold that the trial court did not err and therefore affirm its judgment.
In 2002, C. Lester Paul and Margaret S. Paul, individually and on behalf of a number of corporate entities, initiated this action in Lawrence Circuit Court against Gasbusters, which action was designated No. 02-CI-00274. The corporate entities were stated as Delstar Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation; Delstar Resources, Inc. (KY), an administratively dissolved Kentucky corporation; Bluegrass Drilling Corporation, Inc., a Kentucky corporation; and Delta Gas Corporation, Inc., a Georgia corporation. In addition, The Viking Group, Inc., included in the caption and body of the Complaint, was stated to be a sole proprietorship and assumed name of C. Lester Paul. The Complaint stated six counts:
Count I alleged Gasbusters owed plaintiffs and Bluegrass Drilling certain costs and expenses for labor and services for operating oil and gas wells operated by Gasbusters. The amount claimed due for the years 1996, 1997, and 1998, including interest, was approximately $440,000.
Count II alleged that Gasbusters, the partnership, was incorrectly organized and that the individually named defendants were jointly and severally liable to plaintiffs for the amounts claimed due from Gasbusters.
Count III alleged that plaintiffs and Delstar Resources were the owners of certain oil and gas mineral rights in Lawrence and Martin Counties, which were subject to a 1980 lease to Raymond Burgess. These rights were claimed to be subject to a sublease to Gasbusters, as to which Gasbusters had failed to pay the contracted royalties. The amount claimed was in excess of $50,000.
Count IV alleged that plaintiffs and Delta were the assignees of a 1980 Production Mortgage on oil and gas wells known as the "Robertson Coal Co. Wells Nos. 1 and 3." The amount claimed due was $180,000. Count IV also alleged plaintiffs and Delta were the assignees of a Mortgage and a Quitclaim and Sublease Agreement dated June 15, 1991, securing payment of a $72,000 mortgage note from Raymond Burgess. Gasbusters was alleged to be liable to pay these amounts.
Count V alleged that C. Lester Paul was the assignee from Appalachian Natural Gas Corp. and Raymond Burgess of all claims and causes of action under another Lawrence Circuit Court action, docket no. 94-CI-00144, Appalachian Natural Gas Corp. and Raymond Burgess v. William J. M. Polan, Gasbusters, Inc., and Gasbusters Limited Partnership . The judgment sought under this other action was $350,000.
Count VI alleged that Gasbusters had erroneously received a royalty payment from Dominion Field Services, LLC, for production on well meter No. 824440.
In 2004, the Pauls, as Debtors, filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the Western District of Kentucky. Both Cadle and The Cadle Company, II ("Cadle II") were listed on the Debtors' Petition for Relief as creditors and were participating parties in the Pauls' bankruptcy action. In May 2005, the bankruptcy court approved the Bankruptcy Trustee's sale to Cadle of the Pauls' interests in the Lawrence Circuit Court Civil Action No. 02-CI-00274, the present action. Cadle was then substituted as a party plaintiff in the Lawrence Circuit Court Action by Order entered in August 2005.1 The Lawrence Circuit Court action lay dormant while the parties and their counsel shifted their focus to litigating various claims in the federal courts.
In the bankruptcy proceeding, Gasbusters filed a proof of claim. Initially, the Trustee objected on the basis that the claim was unliquidated. Gasbusters then filed an amended proof of claim which liquidated the amounts claimed. The Trustee later withdrew his objection, but Cadle II, which had purchased substantially all of the Pauls' bankruptcy estate, objected. One of Cadle II's objections was that certain expenses and other offset items were to be taken into account to reduce the amount of the claim. In supplemental answers to Gasbusters' Interrogatories, which were filed in September 2008, Cadle II described these offsets, as follows:
(emphasis added).
By letter dated December 3, 2008, Cadle's counsel provided detail with respect to the claimed offsets:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Massey v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
... ... represented.” Cadle Co. v. Gasbusters Prod. I Ltd ... P'ship , ... ...
-
Lake Cumberland Reg'l Hosp., LLC v. Adams, 2016-SC-000181-DG
...against Dr. Bailey. "Creditors of the debtors are parties to a bankruptcy proceeding." Cadle Company v. Gasbusters Production I Limited Partnership, 509 S.W.3d 713, 719 (Ky. App. 2016) (citing Sanders Confectionery Prods., Inc., v. Heller Fin., Inc., 973 F.2d 474, 481 (6th Cir. 1992) ). Spr......