Cagle v. Cagle, 42626
Decision Date | 18 March 1980 |
Docket Number | No. 42626,42626 |
Citation | 290 N.W.2d 192,205 Neb. 747 |
Parties | Violet H. CAGLE, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Lewis Vernon CAGLE, Appellant and Cross-Appellee. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
Divorce: Alimony: Child Support: Appeal and Error. Alimony and child support determinations, whether in an original proceeding or in an action to modify, require subjective reasoning and analysis based on the evidence and witnesses before the trial court, and will not be disturbed on appeal unless there appears a clear basis in the record for finding the trial court abused its discretion.
Norman H. Wright of Fraser, Stryker, Veach, Vaughn, Meusey, Olson & Boyer, P.C., Omaha, for appellant and cross-appellee.
Michael P. Cavel of Emil F. Sodoro, P.C., Omaha, for appellee and cross-appellant.
Heard before KRIVOSHA, C. J., BRODKEY, and HASTINGS, JJ., and REAGAN and NORTON, District Judges.
This is an action to modify alimony and child support provisions of a divorce decree. From an order reducing the alimony payments, Mr. Cagle has appealed, contending an abuse of discretion by the trial court. Appellee has cross-appealed claiming an abuse of discretion in reducing child support payments.
The parties were divorced in 1972. They owned a family corporation known as Cagle, Inc., which was engaged in the drywall construction business. The company had been formed by Mr. Cagle a few years prior to their marriage with a capital investment of $3,000. The company prospered with gross sales of nearly $5 million for the year preceding the divorce. According to financial statements submitted by appellant, his net worth was approximately $500,000 in July of 1971, and it increased to just over $1.5 million as of September 1972. The parties had been married for nearly 7 years, had two children of their own, and appellee adopted two children from Mr. Cagle's first marriage. At the time of the divorce, Mr. Cagle was drawing a salary of $52,000, plus other income of approximately $20,000 and fringe benefits. Appellee was unemployed. By the terms of the property agreement and decree, Mr. Cagle received all the stock in Cagle, Inc., as well as other marital properties. Mrs. Cagle received cash and property totaling $90,000, alimony of $1,000 per month for 275 months or until her death, custody of the two children born of the marriage, and child support of $300 per month per child.
In 1977 Cagle, Inc., suffered severe financial setbacks which resulted in an adjudication of bankruptcy. Appellant's employment and income from the corporation ceased. Mr. Cagle then...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Keener v. Graff, s. S-94-1232
...child. It is axiomatic, however, that a court may not modify a child support order without hearing any evidence. See Cagle v. Cagle, 205 Neb. 747, 290 N.W.2d 192 (1980) (modification of support order requires subjective reasoning and analysis based on evidence and In examining the record an......
-
Maricle v. Maricle
...support will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record establishes that the trial court abused its discretion. Cagle v. Cagle, 205 Neb. 747, 290 N.W.2d 192 (1980). The respondent contends that the funds now held in trust by the conservator for his benefit are not part of the marital esta......
- Johnson v. Vitek, 42613