Cain v. Cleveland Parachute Training Center

Decision Date18 March 1983
Citation9 OBR 28,457 N.E.2d 1185,9 Ohio App.3d 27
Parties, 9 O.B.R. 28 CAIN, Appellant, v. CLEVELAND PARACHUTE TRAINING CENTER, Appellee.
CourtOhio Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court

A participant in a recreational activity is free to contract with the proprietor of such activity so as to relieve the proprietor of responsibility for damages or injuries to the participant caused by the negligence of the proprietor, except when caused by wilful or wanton misconduct.

Alan S. Levine, Warrensville Heights, for appellant.

Wallace E. King, Chardon, for appellee.

COOK, Presiding Judge.

On June 28, 1980, Robert W. Cain, appellant herein, went to a facility of the Cleveland Sport Parachute Training Center, appellee herein, for training in parachuting. Upon his arrival, appellant was asked to sign and did sign a "Waiver, Release, and Hold Harmless Agreement" which read as follows:

"I, Robert W. Cain, of 5235 Lynd, Lyndhurst, Ohio 44124 the undersigned, hereby acknowledge my receipt of the permission to participate in parachute jumping as a member or guest of the Cleveland Sport Parachuting Center of Grove Road, or any other field the Center may use. In consideration of the permission and privilege allowed me hereunder, I do hereby specifically agree that I will indemnify, save and hold harmless the Cleveland Sport Parachuting Center, Dale Gates, Lucinda Gates and Bob Gates, its instructors, agents and all persons whether participants or spectators of the Grove Road field or elsewhere, from any and all losses, claims, actions, or proceedings of every kind and character which may be presented or initiated to recover money, property, or damages for any injuries to persons, or injurious results, or any damages to property suffered during the conduct of the above described event and arising directly or indirectly from any activity by me as a parachute jump student, member or participant.

"In accepting the permission and privilege to participate under this 'Waiver, Release and Hold Harmless Agreement,' I understand that this extends to and applies to any personal injuries, injurious results, damages or losses which I, myself, may experience or sustain while engaged in training or parachuting with the Cleveland Sport Parachuting Center. I covenant for myself, my estate, executor, heirs and assigns not to file suit or initiate any claim procedure in respect to any personal injuries, property damages, or losses I may experience or sustain arising directly or indirectly out of my activities hereunder.

"I freely assume all risks, hazards, and losses which may befall me in connection with my exercise of the permission and privilege allowed me hereunder. I acknowledge that I have fully inspected and am adequately informed of all pertinent physical conditions of aerology and topography in the vicinity of the Grove Road field, or any other field the Center may use.

"This 'Waiver, Release and Hold Harmless Agreement' shall also apply to pre-jump access or activity by the undersigned on the air fields and drop zones in use by the Cleveland Sport Parachuting Center."

In his first parachute jump, appellant broke one of his legs.

On June 11, 1981, appellant filed a complaint against appellee alleging appellee had negligently trained him for the parachute jump, failed to maintain the area around which he was instructed to land, and failed to provide adequate jumping equipment. Appellee filed an answer denying any negligence and asserting the affirmative defenses of assumption of risk and release.

Appellee filed a motion...

To continue reading

Request your trial
32 cases
  • Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 26 Febrero 1992
    ...v. Special Services, Inc. (1958), 107 Ohio App. 435, 8 O.O.2d 421, 159 N.E.2d 785. See, also, Cain v. Cleveland Parachute Training Ctr. (1983), 9 Ohio App.3d 27, 9 OBR 28, 457 N.E.2d 1185. Reviewing all the evidence in the record before us in a light most favorable to appellants, as require......
  • Johnson v. Rapid City Softball Ass'n, 18269
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • 30 Marzo 1994
    ...Association, 50 Misc.2d 97, 269 N.Y.S.2d 789 (1965), aff'd, 28 A.D.2d 960, 282 N.Y.S.2d 930 (1967); Cain v. Cleveland Parachute Training Center, 9 Ohio App.3d 27, 457 N.E.2d 1185 (1983); Huckaby v. Confederate Motor Speedway, Inc., 276 S.C. 629, 281 S.E.2d 223 (1981); Corpus Christi Speedwa......
  • Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 29 Noviembre 2005
    ...(go-cart racing); Kondrad v. Bismarck Park District, 655 N.W.2d 411, 414 (N.D.2003) (bicycling); Cain v. Cleveland Parachute Training Center, 9 Ohio App.3d 27, 28, 457 N.E.2d 1185 (1983) (skydiving); Manning v. Brannon, 956 P.2d 156, 159 (Okla.Civ. App.1997) (skydiving); Mann v. Wetter, 100......
  • Schutkowski v. Carey
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 30 Septiembre 1986
    ...participant caused by the negligence of the proprietor, except when caused by willful or wanton misconduct. [Citations omitted.]" Id., 457 N.E.2d at 1187. In Jones v. Dressel, supra, the Colorado Supreme Court developed a four-part test to determine whether a negligence exculpatory clause i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Negligence Disclaimers in Hazardous Recreational Activities
    • United States
    • Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Bar Journal No. 68, 1993
    • Invalid date
    ...should provide a viable defense to a defendant in a lawsuit. *Both of the New Haven Bar. 1 Cain v. Cleveland Parachute Training Center, 457 N.E.2d 1185,1186 (Ohio App.1983) 2 Weiner v. Mt. Airy Lodge, Inc., 719 F. Supp. 342 (M.D. Penn. 1989) exculpatory language in ski rental agreement barr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT