Caine v. Com.

Decision Date07 October 1975
Citation368 Mass. 815,335 N.E.2d 340
PartiesEdward W. CAINE, administrator v. COMMONWEALTH.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Donald J. Fleming, Mattaposett, for plaintiff.

Francis X. Bellotti, Atty. Gen., and W. Channing Beucler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth, submitted a brief.

Before TAURO, C.J., and REARDON, BRAUCHER, HENNESSEY, KAPLAN, and WILKINS, JJ.

RESCRIPT.

The plaintiff, as administrator on March 4, 1974, brought an action against the Commonwealth for its alleged negligent failure to keep a State highway free of an unnatural accumulation of ice, thereby causing a collision of vehicles on January 14, 1972, in which the decedent, the driver of one of them, was alleged to have suffered injuries which resulted in her death on the same day after conscious suffering. Damages of $500,000 were claimed. The judge of the Superior Court on March 24, 1974, allowed, without opinion, a motion by the Commonwealth to dismiss the declaration; the ground urged by the Commonwealth was the formal one that the plaintiff had proceeded by writ and declaration rather than petition and order of notice, as then required by G.L. c. 258, § 1. The statute has since been amended by St.1973, c. 1114, § 337, effective July 1, 1974, to conform to the new Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure. To 'ensure justice,' we examine the merits which have been argued. See Mass. R.Civ.P. 1A, par. 10, 365 Mass. (1974); Mass.R.A.P. 1A, 365 Mass. (1974). The declaration was in three counts. One count sought a declaratory judgment that the Commonwealth was not shielded by any immunity and was liable to the same extent as any ordinary defendant would be for negligent conduct. This count deserved to be dismissed because, as we recently said in Hannigan v. New Gamma -delta Chapter of Kappa Sigma Fraternity, Inc., --- Mass. ---, a 327 N.E.2d 882 (1975), we are not at present disposed to attempt by decision to declare how far the Commonwealth's immunity should be eliminated; preferably the matter should be dealt with by legislation. See Morash & Sons, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 363 Mass. 612 b, 296 N.E.2d 461 (1973). Indeed, in the present case there is legislation, G.L. c. 81, § 18 (referring internally to G.L. c. 84, §§ 15, 18, and 19), that sets forth and limits in character and amount the responsibility of the Commonwealth for injuries sustained by persons traveling on State highways by reason of certain defects in those roads. The other two counts of the declaration, however, attempting to claim...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Whitney v. City of Worcester
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • August 16, 1977
    ...by case adjudication. Morash & Sons v. Commonwealth, 363 Mass. 612, 296 N.E.2d 461 (1973). See Caine v. Commonwealth, --- Mass. --- a, 335 N.E.2d 340; Hannigan v. New Gamma-Delta Chapter of Kappa Sigma Fraternity, Inc., --- Mass. --- b, 327 N.E.2d 882 (1975). Four years have passed since ou......
  • Nantucket Land Council, Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Nantucket
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • March 30, 1977
    ...court. 15 See Charbonnier v. Amico, --- Mass. ---, ---, --- j , 324 N.E.2d 895 (1975); Caine v. Commonwealth, --- Mass. ---, --- k , 335 N.E.2d 340 (1975); Balsavich v. Teamsters Local 170, --- Mass. ---, --- l , 356 N.E.2d 1217 Appeal dismissed. 1 The board of health of the town and Harrie......
  • Ram v. Town of Charlton
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • March 7, 1991
    ...in ways under their control. The language in St.1978, c. 512, § 18, permits no other reasonable conclusion. See Caine v. Commonwealth, 368 Mass. 815, 816, 335 N.E.2d 340 (1975). We now hold that G.L. c. 81, § 18, like G.L. c. 84, § 15, is an exclusive remedy. If the plaintiff's action falls......
  • Aliberti v. Green
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • February 15, 1978
    ...dismissal vote. See Gallagher v. Wheeler, 292 Mass. 547, 551, 198 N.E. 891 (1935); Caine v. Commonwealth, --- Mass. ---, --- a, 335 N.E.2d 340 (1975). The issue of substance before us in this inquiry is whether the plaintiffs' allegation regarding the majority of Hillview, Inc., shareholder......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT