Calamore v. Calamore
| Decision Date | 24 January 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-2047,88-2047 |
| Citation | 555 So.2d 1302 |
| Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly D241 Peter J. CALAMORE, Appellant, v. Jeanne F. CALAMORE, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Klein, Beranek & Walsh, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Peggy Rowe-Linn, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Neil B. Jagolinzer of Christiansen, Jacknin & Tuthill, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
We reverse the trial court's distribution of the parties' marital assets.
We hold that the trial court erred in awarding the wife $15,000.00 from the husband's deferred compensation savings plan as lump sum alimony with no apparent consideration of the tax and penalty consequences to be incurred. The savings plan is a deferred compensation plan through which the employer matches 50% of the employee's contribution, up to a maximum of 3% of the employee's income. Upon withdrawal, the husband must pay taxes and penalties on the tax deferred portion of the plan. The final judgment states that the savings plan was worth $100,000.00 at the time of dissolution and awards the wife $15,000.00 lump sum alimony from the plan. However, using the husband's current tax rate of 28%, the husband's accountant determined that the savings plan is only worth $64,191.00 if the money is withdrawn now. In light of this considerable difference between the pre- and post-tax values of the plan, we find that the trial court failed to equitably distribute the parties' assets.
We also hold that the trial court erred in distributing as a marital asset the account entitled "Peter Calamore as Custodian for Three Minor Children under the Uniform Gift to Minor's Act." The parties had stipulated that the account would not be distributed and that the wife's name would be added to the account so that both parties would be given equal control of the trust. Thus, the trial court erred in distributing the account in a manner contrary to the parties' stipulation.
Furthermore, the award of attorney's fees to the wife is reversed because the final judgment omitted the findings required pursuant to Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985). Upon remand, the trial court shall make the requisite findings under Rowe. Wilkins v. Wilkins, 546 So.2d 44, 46 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
Accordingly, the award of attorney's fees to the wife and the distribution of the marital assets in the final judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a redetermination of an...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Brock v. Brock
...1992); Blythe v. Blythe, 592 So.2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Gentile v. Gentile, 565 So.2d 820 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Calamore v. Calamore, 555 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).14 Stodtko v. Stodtko, 636 So.2d 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (error to impute earnings to husband higher than he had ever ea......
-
Gentile v. Gentile, s. 89-1410
...a 40% tax and penalty on withdrawal. Such a consequence should have been considered by the trial court but was not. Calamore v. Calamore, 555 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Secondly, the thrift plan was part of the trial court's equitable distribution of marital assets. The husband was all......
-
Rey v. Rey, 90-1102
...spouse's filing individual return to be considered on remand when reevaluating the entire equitable distribution); Calamore v. Calamore, 555 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (trial court improperly ignored evidence of tax consequence presented by husband's accountant regarding a retirement pl......
-
Werner v. Werner, 90-10
...the court should consider the resulting tax liability. Gentile v. Gentile, 565 So.2d 820 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Calamore v. Calamore, 555 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Expert testimony demonstrated that the notes and mortgages awarded to the husband as part of the equitable distribution of ......
-
Equitable distribution and property issues
...(trial court affirmed in reducing values of notes and mortgages to allow for credit for existing tax liabilities); Calamore v. Calamore, 555 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (trial court erred in awarding wife $15,000 from husband’s deferred compensation savings plan with no apparent conside......
-
Appendix Twenty-Six
...cases in which it was held that courts must consider contingent tax consequences in equitable distribution was Calamore v. Calamore , 555 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). In Calamore , the trial court erred in awarding the wife $15,000 from the husband’s deferred compensation savings plan a......
-
Tax-effecting marital property: the wild card in valuation.
...property. The Fourth District, in direct contravention to the position of the Third District in Levan, held in Calamore v. Calamore, 555 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1990), that the trial court committed error in not considering the differences between the pre-tax and post-tax values of the......