Calderone v. Wright
| Decision Date | 29 October 1971 |
| Citation | 274 N.E.2d 588,360 Mass. 174 |
| Parties | Marie E. CALDERONE, administratrix, v. Terrill W. WRIGHT and another. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
John W. Costello, Boston, for plaintiff.
Philander S. Ratzkoff, Boston, for defendants.
Before TAURO, C.J., and CUTTER, REARDON, QUIRICO, and HENNESSEY, JJ.
This is an action of tort brought by the wife of the decedent as administratrix of his estate, following a motor vehicle accident which resulted in the death of her husband. The sole issue is the correctness of the trial judge's allowance of the defendants' motion for directed verdicts. 'The question presented by the motion was not the weight of the evidence but whether there was any evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff that would support her cause of action.' Howes v. Kelman, 326 Mass. 696, 697, 96 N.E.2d 394, 395.
We recite the facts which the jury could find on the evidence. On February 25, 1964, at approximately 6:30 P.M. the defendant Wright was operating a large eight foot wide tank trailer truck owned by the defendant G. Murphy Transportation, Inc., going east on Route 20 in Wayland. The roadway was twenty-eight feet in width with a center line dividing the eastbound and westbound lanes. The decedent was driving west in a small Rambler station wagon. The weather was clear and the street lights were on in the vicinity of the accident. There was a collision between the two vehicles and the Rambler went to its left of the road into a snow embankment.
Photographs introduced in evidence revealed extensive damage to the left front and left side of the Rambler. There was a mark on the road leading from a point 'just a little to the right of the center line' to the rear of the Rambler in the snowbank.
The defendant Wright testified that he did not remember whether, as he approached the point of the accident, he saw the decedent's car coming from the opposite direction but that he saw other cars coming; he could see the road clearly for 150 feet before the accident. He did not see the center line of the roadway before the accident although he did see it after the accident. He said, 'all he felt was like a thump, like a hole in the road.'
A number of photographs of the two vehicles and the roadway taken shortly after the accident were admitted in evidence. One of the photographs indicates extensive scuff marks on the outer surface of a left rear tire of the tank trailer which the defendant Wright identified as the area of contact.
One Brown, also an employee of the defendant G. Murphy Transportation, Inc., was called by the plaintiff and declared by the trial judge to be a hostile witness. He testified that he was driving about 150 yards behind Wright. He saw the decedent's car collide with the front of the rear tandem of the trailer. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bank v. Thermo Elemental Inc.
...at trial. Nevertheless, the jury were not obliged to accept what Lambert said, in whole or in part. See, e.g., Calderone v. Wright, 360 Mass. 174, 176, 274 N.E.2d 588 (1971); Lydon v. Boston Elevated Ry., 309 Mass. 205, 206, 34 N.E.2d 642 (1941). Countervailing evidence certainly was before......
-
Payton v. Abbott Labs, 85-1247
...842, 849 (1st Cir.1985); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Penn Central Company, 420 F.2d 560, 564 & n. 7 (1st Cir.1970); Calderone v. Wright, 360 Mass. 174, 274 N.E.2d 588, 589 (1971). On our reading of the record, we determine that the jury had evidence from which to find the 25 mg. DES was probabl......
-
Alholm v. Town of Wareham
...the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs. Chase v. Roy, 363 Mass. 402, 294 N.E.2d 336 (1973); Calderone v. Wright, 360 Mass. 174, 274 N.E.2d 588 (1971). DeAngelis v. Boston Elevated Ry., 304 Mass. 461, 23 N.E.2d 859 (1939). We first summarize the evidence with respect to t......
-
Balkin v. Frank M. Katz, Inc.
...363 Mass. 402, 404, 294 N.E.2d 336 (1973); Raunela v. Hertz Corp., 361 Mass. 341, 343, 280 N.E.2d 179 (1972); Calderone v. Wright, 360 Mass. 174, 175, 274 N.E.2d 588 (1971); Howes v. Kelman, 326 Mass. 696, 697, 96 N.E.2d 394 (1951). Had it been the jury who concluded that Balkin did continu......