Caldwell Oil Co. v. Hickman
Decision Date | 18 February 1925 |
Docket Number | (No. 6840.) |
Citation | 270 S.W. 214 |
Parties | CALDWELL OIL CO. v. HICKMAN et ux. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Caldwell County; M. C. Jeffrey, Judge.
Action by Frank Hickman and wife against the Caldwell Oil Company. From an order overruling defendant's motion to set aside a default judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Jno. N. Gambrell, of Lockhart, for appellant.
This is an appeal from an order overruling a motion to vacate and set aside a default judgment. The following is the history of the case:
On October 11, 1923. Frank and Annie Hickman, husband and wife, and Frank Hickman as next friend of their minor son, Hubert Hickman, sued Caldwell Oil Company, a corporation, for damages for personal injuries sustained by Hubert Hickman while in its employ as a derrickman drilling an oil well. He was injured by falling 70 feet from the elevator of the derrick to the derrick floor, which injuries were alleged to be serious and permanent, and the direct and proximate results of certain alleged acts of negligence of appellant's employees. The parents sought $1,800 damages for themselves, and for the minor son $10,000 was sought.
On October 11, 1923, citation issued out of said cause, commanding the sheriff or constable to summon "Caldwell Oil Company, a Texas corporation, with W. H. Kokernot as president, and E. B. McKean, secretary and treasurer, upon whom service may be had," to appear at the regular term, naming it, being the 22d of October, 1923, to answer the cause; and further commanding, "And you will deliver to each of said defendants, in person, a true copy of this citation." On the same day, October 11, 1923, the citation was served upon E. B. McKean, secretary and treasurer, and return made and filed in the district court October 26, 1923.
November 3, 1923, judgment by default was rendered for $6,000 against appellant, upon a hearing before the court, a jury being waived. allotting $5,000 to the minor and $1,000 to the parents.
On November 14, 1923, appellant filed its motion to vacate and set aside the default judgment, and asked permission to file its answer to the suit. November 17, 1923, appellees answered the motion, and on the same day appellant filed its rejoinder to the answer of appellees. The pleadings of all parties were sworn to, and certain facts alleged by appellant were set forth in affidavits attached as exhibits to its motion. The court heard the pleadings, the evidence, and argument of counsel on November 17, 1923, the last day of the term of court at which the judgment was rendered, and overruled the motion to vacate and set aside; hence this appeal.
Appellant principally contends that even though citation may have been legally issued and served upon it in time to have required it to appear and defend the suit at the October term, 1923, that such service was under circumstances excusing it in not answering, and that equity and justice, under the facts and circumstances adduced on the trial of the motion to vacate and set aside the default judgment, demand that it be set aside and vacated; a meritorious defense or defenses to appellees' cause of action having been pleaded and shown in support of the motion to vacate.
Appellant pleaded first as a defense to the cause of action asserted its membership in the Texas Employers' Insurance Association; that Hubert Hickman had notice of its membership and good standing in said association and accepted employment on such terms; and that under the laws of Texas he must look solely for any damages to such association. Appellant also pleaded facts constituting a defense to appellees' common-law action for damages. It also pleaded the excessiveness of the damages awarded. A meritorious defense to the suit was therefore alleged. Sufficient proof on the motion was made to sustain these defenses.
As excusing it of negligence in failing to answer though legally served with citation, the following facts were pleaded and proved: E. B. McKean, secretary and treasurer of appellant corporation, made the following affidavit concerning the service of citation upon him:
W. H. Kokernot, the president of defendant corporation, made the following affidavit in support of the motion to vacate the judgment:
Kokernot also swore that it was generally known that he was in charge of the property of appellant in Caldwell county.
The attorney, J. W. Rainbolt, by affidavit attached to the motion to vacate the judgment, swore:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
San Antonio Paper Co. v. Morgan, 7723.
...of plaintiff or plaintiff's agents or attorneys have excused the apparent laches or negligence of defendant. Caldwell Oil Co. v. Hickman (Tex. Civ. App.) 270 S. W. 214; Chaney v. Allen (Tex. Civ. App.) 25 S.W.(2d) 1115. No such case is presented here, but the sole cause for appellant's fail......
-
Trigg v. Gray
...S. W. 195; Stoudenmeier v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 246 S. W. 761; Costley v. Chapman (Tex. Civ. App.) 262 S. W. 543; Caldwell Oil Co. v. Hickman (Tex. Civ. App.) 270 S. W. 214; Colorado River Syndicate Subscribers v. Alexander (Tex. Civ. App.) 288 S. W. Appellants' motion set up defenses to t......