Caldwell v. Coughlin
| Decision Date | 30 March 1989 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Ricky CALDWELL, Petitioner, v. Thomas A. COUGHLIN, III, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ricky Caldwell, Dannemora, pro se.
Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. (Joseph Koczaja, of counsel), Albany, for respondents.
Before MAHONEY, P.J., and WEISS, LEVINE, MERCURE and HARVEY, JJ.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 () to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, an inmate at Clinton Correctional Facility in Clinton County, was charged with a violation of rule 113.10, possessing a weapon, and was found guilty after a hearing. Following unsuccessful administrative review, petitioner brought this CPLR article 78 proceeding, transferred to this court pursuant to CPLR 7804(g), seeking to annul the determination. The sole contention raised in the proceeding is that the administrative determination was not supported by substantial evidence in the record.
The evidence presented at the hearing was that petitioner was away from his cell block from February 25 to February 27 1988 in connection with the "family reunion" program. A search of petitioner's cell on February 26, 1988 disclosed a 14 3/4-inch-long shank secreted in a narrow gap between the cell's locking system and door, a location accessible from inside or outside the cell. Petitioner testified, claiming that the weapon was not his.
In our view, the determination was supported by substantial evidence and should be confirmed. The correction officer's testimony as to the presence of the weapon in an area immediately accessible to petitioner's cell was sufficient to support the administrative determination (see, Matter of Siders v. Le Fevre, App.Div., 536 N.Y.S.2d 206; People v. Craft, 101 A.D.2d 984, 985, 477 N.Y.S.2d 467; Matter of Pike v. Coughlin, 78 A.D.2d 937, 433 N.Y.S.2d 228). Petitioner's claim of innocence simply raised an issue of credibility which was for respondents to resolve (see, Matter of Siders v. Le Fevre, supra, 536 N.Y.S.2d at p. 207; Matter of Toro v. Coughlin, 143 A.D.2d 489, 532 N.Y.S.2d 605). Finally, Matter of Sanchez v. Coughlin, 132 A.D.2d 896, 518 N.Y.S.2d 456 and Matter of Trudo v. Le...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Price v. Coughlin
...control over the area where the shank was found, despite the fact that his access was not exclusive (see, Matter of Caldwell v. Coughlin, 148 A.D.2d 905, 539 N.Y.S.2d 533; cf., Matter of Sanchez v. Coughlin, 132 A.D.2d 896, 518 N.Y.S.2d 456; Matter of Trudo v. LeFevre, 122 A.D.2d 319, 504 N......
-
Vega v. Annucci
...support the determination of guilt (see Matter of McEwen v. Goord, 32 A.D.3d at 1117, 821 N.Y.S.2d 477 ; Matter of Caldwell v. Coughlin, 148 A.D.2d 905, 905, 539 N.Y.S.2d 533 [1989] ). To the extent that petitioner challenges the reliability of the confidential information that prompted the......
-
Moreno v. Coughlin
...v. Le Fevre, 150 A.D.2d 954, 541 N.Y.S.2d 868, lv. denied 74 N.Y.2d 615, 549 N.Y.S.2d 960, 549 N.E.2d 151; Matter of Caldwell v. Coughlin, 148 A.D.2d 905, 539 N.Y.S.2d 533). ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition ...
-
Calderon v. Senkowski
...signed for the package, received it and walked out of the package room with it in his exclusive possession (cf., Matter of Caldwell v. Coughlin, 148 A.D.2d 905, 539 N.Y.S.2d 533). Although petitioner contends that he did not know who sent him the package, the Hearing Officer was entitled to......