Caldwell v. Dickson

Decision Date31 March 1853
Citation17 Mo. 575
PartiesCALDWELL, Defendant in Error, v. DICKSON, Plaintiff in Error.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1. In an action on a note given in advance for the hire of a slave for a fixed period, it was held, that the master could not recover anything, where he had taken the slave away from the defendant without legal cause, before the expiration of the contract term of service.

Error to Marion Circuit Court.

T. Van Swearingen, for plaintiff in error. The contract of hiring being entire and indivisible, the performance of the entire term of service is a condition precedent to the recovery of the consideration or any part of it. 7 Mo. Rep. 96. 2 Mass. Rep. 147. 13 J. R. 390. 19 ib. 337. 3 J. J. Marsh. 689. Cutter v. Powell. 6 T. R.SCOTT, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action on a note for the hire of a female slave for a stated period, payable at the end of the service. Before the expiration of the time for which the slave was hired, the owner unlawfully took her from the possession of the person to whom she was hired. The court below gave judgment against the defendant for a part of the hire, proportioned to the time the slave remained with him.

1. We do not see on what principle in law the action of the plaintiff can be sustained. The law does not permit a man, by his own wrongful act, to apportion his contract. As between lessor and lessee, if the lessee is deprived of any portion of the leasehold, by the act of the lessor, the law discharges him from the payment of the entire rent. The law is equally well settled that, with regard to part performance of an entire contract for labor or service, a refusal or omission to perform the entire labor or service, without act or consent of the other party, will not entitle the party who has performed, in part, to recover any compensation for the service which has been performed. The entire performance is a condition precedent to the payment of the price, and the courts cannot absolve men from their legal engagements or make contracts for them. 2 Kent, 509.

Caldwell, after insulting the family of Dickson, in the absence of the head of it, by ordering away a servant in their employ, to whose services they were justly entitled, should not be permitted to come into a court of justice, apportion his contract, made necessary by his own wrong, and award to himself the compensation he deems just. Many persons hire slaves in preference to other laborers, because they believe the contract...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Earp v. Tyler
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1881
    ...or the “act of God,” he cannot maintain an action for the value of the services he has rendered. Posey v. Garth, 7 Mo. 94; Caldwell v. Dickson, 17 Mo. 575; Schnerr v. Lemp, 19 Mo. 40; Henson v. Hampton, 32 Mo. 408; 2 Parsons on Contracts, 36, and note g. For the rule in the case of building......
  • Stroeh v. McClintock
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • January 27, 1908
    ...been had. [Posey v. Garth, 7 Mo. 94; Schnerr v. Lemp, 19 Mo. 40; Earp v. Tyler, 73 Mo. 619; Banse v. Tate, 62 Mo.App. 150.] In Caldwell v. Dickson, 17 Mo. 575, Judge SCOTT said that "The law does not permit a man, his own wrongful act, to apportion his contract. As between lessor and lessee......
  • Gruetzner v. Aude Furniture Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 1887
    ... ... Bailments, sec. 437; Earp v. Tyler, 73 Mo. 617; ... Posey v. Garth, 7 Mo. 95; Henson v ... Hampton, 32 Mo. 408; Caldwell v. Dickson, 17 ... Mo. 575; Schnerr v. Lemp, 19 Mo. 40; Hamel v ... Freund, 17 Mo.App. 618; Downs v. Smit, 15 ... Mo.App. 583. There was a ... ...
  • Ehrlich v. The AEtna Life Insurance Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 23, 1891
    ... ... (7) The contract involving one of personal service, ... plaintiff cannot recover on a quantum meruit. Henson v ... Hampton, 31 Mo. 410; Caldwell v. Dickson, 17 ... Mo. 575; Earp v. Tylor, 73 Mo. 619. Wherever ... recovery on quantum meruit is permitted it is limited to the ... price fixed ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT