Calhoun v. Pair
| Decision Date | 09 May 1944 |
| Docket Number | 14840. |
| Citation | 30 S.E.2d 180,197 Ga. 703 |
| Parties | CALHOUN v. PAIR. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Roy S. Drennan, of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.
F. Lee Evans, and Douglas, Andrews & Cole, all of Atlanta, for defendant in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court.
The Court of Appeals certified to this court the following questions: Answer: The Justices are in disagreement as to the processes of reasoning by which we reach the ultimate conclusion, but we are unanimous in the view that the answer to the first question is, 'No,' and for this reason no answer to the second question is required.
Question answered.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sowell v. Solomon
...that precludes liability for the parental negligence claims in this action. In this regard, the Defendants point to Calhoun v. Pair , 197 Ga. 703, 30 S.E.2d 180 (1944), where the plaintiff brought an action against the defendant, alleging that plaintiff's 12-year-old son had been injured af......
-
Herrin v. Lamar, 39538
...of an ordinance by a fourteen-year-old on his way to school (Calhoun v. Pair, 71 Ga.App. 211, 30 S.E.2d 776, conf. to cert. quest., 197 Ga. 703, 30 S.E.2d 180; struck by a lawn rake left accessible to a minor (Matthews v. Johnson, 100 Ga.App. 331, 111 S.E.2d 158), and where his livestock wa......
-
Stephens v. Stewart, 43584.
...brought to our attention wherein the family-purpose doctrine has been extended beyond its application to automobiles. In Calhoun v. Pair, 197 Ga. 703 (30 SE2d 180), the court declared that a father who furnishes a bicycle to his minor son (14 years old) for the purpose of going to and from ......
- Cook v. Cook