California State Bd. of Funeral Directors and Embalmersv. Mortuary in Westminster Memorial Park
Decision Date | 10 April 1969 |
Citation | 271 Cal.App.2d 638,76 Cal.Rptr. 832 |
Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Parties | CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF FUNERAL DIRECTORS AND EMBALMERS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MORTUARY IN WESTMINSTER MEMORIAL PARK, a corporation, and Westminster Memorial Park, a corporation, Defendants and Respondents. Civ. 9137. |
*
This action was brought by the plaintiff, State Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, to enjoin the defendants, Mortuary In Westminster Memorial Park, a corporation (Mortuary), and Westminster Memorial Park, a corporation (Cemetery), from jointly engaging in allegedly false and misleading advertising in violation of Business and Professions Code, Sections 17500, 17505, 7617 and 7629. Defendants have separately answered the complaint and each has cross-complained for declaratory relief, requesting a judicial declaration that the specific advertisements referred to in the complaint are not in violation of the Business and Professions Code. After trial the court found and concluded the advertisements were not in violation of the code sections, refused to issue an injunction, and entered judgment accordingly. From this judgment plaintiff has appealed.
The two respondents are separately owned and operated corporations. The mortuary is licensed by the appellant Board, and the cemetery operates under a Certificate of Authority issued by the State Cemetery Board. The mortuary owns the land upon which its building is located in the City of Westminster, County of Orange. The mortuary property is completely surrounded by the property owned and operated by the cemetery. The building housing the administrative offices of the cemetery is adjacent to the mortuary building and the two are connected by a breezeway. One receptionist serves both respondents and they share the cost of her services. No contention is made that the two businesses are not operated separately; the objection is to their advertising.
In 1959 or 1960 respondents began to engage in joint advertising. The specific ads to which the complaint is addressed are:
a. In the yellow pages of the classified telephone directory for Orange County:
'WESTMINSTER MEMORIAL PARK Undertaking & Cemetery TOGETHER'
b. Sign posted near the entrance to the cemetery grounds:
'WESTMINSTER Memorial Park MORTUARY-CEMETERY'
c. Newspaper advertisement in Santa Ana Register:
'Everything in one Beautiful Place WESTMINSTER MEMORIAL PARK MORTUARY-CEMETERY'
The applicable sections of the Business and Professions Code read:
' § 7617. PLACE OF BUSINESS; NECESSITY OF LICENSE. The business of a funeral director shall be conducted and engaged in at a fixed place or establishment.
'No person, partnership, association, corporation or other organization, shall open or maintain a place or establishment at which to engage in or conduct, or hold himself or itself out as engaging in or conducting, the business of a funeral director without a license.'
' § 7629. MISLEADING NAMES; CHANGE OF NAME. No funeral establishment shall be conducted or held forth as being conducted or advertised as being conducted under any name which might tend to mislead the public or which would be sufficiently like the name of any other...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Christensen v. Superior Court
...v. Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers (1978) 79 Cal.App.3d 874, 145 Cal.Rptr. 275; State Bd. of Funeral Directors v. Mortuary in Westminister Memorial Park (1969) 271 Cal.App.2d 638, 76 Cal.Rptr. 832.)Defendants may, of course, demonstrate during proceedings to certify the class, or at ......
-
Californians for Population Stabilization v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
...conduct is not in violation of section 17200 amounts to a conclusion of law. (State Bd. of Funeral Directors v. Mortuary in Westminster Memorial Park (1969) 271 Cal.App.2d 638, 642, 76 Cal.Rptr. 832.) Such conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. (Freeman v. Time, Inc. (9th Cir.1995) 68 F.3......
-
Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co.
...in Haskell and variants thereof applied in other cases. (Ibid., also citing State Bd. of Funeral Directors v. Mortuary in Westminster Memorial Park (1969) 271 Cal.App.2d 638, 642, 76 Cal.Rptr. 832 ["what a person of ordinary intelligence would imply" from ads in a § 17500 false advertising ......
-
Douglas v. Janis
...v. Bristol Development Co., 62 Cal.2d 861, 865, 44 Cal.Rptr. 767, 402 P.2d 839; State Bd. of Funeral Directors v. Mortuary in Westminister Memorial Park, 271 Cal.App.2d 638, 642, 76 Cal.Rptr. 832.)6 Forslund actually contains language showing that a certificate of mailing referring only to ......
-
Business torts and actions
...that the cemetery was doing mortuary business. State Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers v. Mortuary in Westminster Memorial Park , 271 Cal. App. 2d 638, 642, 76 Cal. Rptr. 832 (1969). A complaint describing and alleging a scheme that misled customers was not deficient for failing to ple......