California State Grange v. National Marine Fish.
Decision Date | 27 October 2008 |
Docket Number | No. 1:06-CV-00453 OWW DLB.,No. 1:06-CV-00308 OWW DLB.,1:06-CV-00308 OWW DLB.,1:06-CV-00453 OWW DLB. |
Citation | 620 F.Supp.2d 1111 |
Parties | CALIFORNIA STATE GRANGE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, et al., Defendants, and Federation of Fly Fishers, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Modesto Irrigation District, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary of Commerce, et al., Defendants, and Northern California Council of Federation of Fly Fishers, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California |
Damien Michael Schiff, Robin L. Rivett, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA, Joy Alison Warren, Modesto Irrigation District, Modesto, CA, Tim P. O'Laughlin, William C. Paris, III, O'Laughlin & Paris, LLP, Chico, CA, Roger K. Masuda, Griffith & Masuda, Turlock, CA, Kenneth M. Robbins, Mason, Robbins, Browning & Godwin LLP, Merced, CA, Steven P. Emrick, South San Joaquin Irrigation District, General Counsel, Manteca, CA, Jeanne M. Zolezzi, Jennifer L. Spaletta, Herum Crabtree Brown, Stockton, CA, for Plaintiffs.
Bridget Kennedy McNeil, United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Res. Div., Wildlife & Marine Resources, Denver, CO, for Defendants.
Kristen Lee Boyles, Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, Seattle, WA, Michael Ramsey Sherwood, Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund Incorporated, Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Intervenors.
Stephen D. Mashuda, Patti A. Goldman, Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, Seattle, WA.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
...part of their lives in estuarine waters, if the remaining time is spent in fresh water. See Cal. State Grange v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv. , 620 F.Supp.2d 1111, 1120 n.1 (E.D. Cal. 2008), as corrected (Oct. 31, 2008). NMFS is granted jurisdiction over fish species that (1) spend the majo......
-
Natural Res. Def. Council v. Zinke
...part of their lives in estuarine waters, if the remaining time is spent in fresh water. See Cal. State Grange v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv. , 620 F.Supp.2d 1111, 1120 n.1 (E.D. Cal. 2008), as corrected (Oct. 31, 2008). NMFS is granted jurisdiction over fish species that (1) spend the majo......
-
Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar
...Washington as threatened).Idaho and Montana also cite Trout Unlimited, 559 F.3d at 961-62, and California State Grange v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., 620 F.Supp.2d 1111, 1152 (E.D.Cal.2008), for the proposition that partial listings of a DPS are permitted under the ESA. Those cases, howev......
-
Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Jewell
...ability of natural populations to survive in the wild." Trout Unlimited, 559 F.3d at 957; accord Cal. State Grange v. Nat. Marine Fisheries Serv., 620 F. Supp. 2d 1111, 1156-57 (E.D. Cal 2008). Thus, while the agency may rely on captive populations to reestablish a species in the wild, the ......