Callahan v. Reinhardt
Decision Date | 12 May 1913 |
Citation | 132 P. 387,24 Colo.App. 199 |
Parties | CALLAHAN et al. v. REINHARDT. |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Logan County; H.P. Burke, Judge.
Action by J.B. Reinhardt against Peter Callahan and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed.
McConley & Hinkley, of Sterling, for appellants.
Munson & Munson, of Sterling, for appellee.
Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an action to quiet title to one-half of a quarter section of land. The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of the following citations:
A tax deed is void on its face if noncontiguous tracts of land are sold en masse for a gross sum, even when bid in by the county; or if the county clerk assigns the certificate of purchase more than three years after the sale. Fleming v. Howell, 22 Colo.App. 382, 125 P. 551; Stephens-Wilmot Inv. Co. v. Howell, 128 P. 476; Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Coleman, 129 P. 522.
The five-years statute of limitation, limiting the time within which an action shall be commenced to recover land sold for taxes, is no defense in an action to quiet title; nor does it apply where it is based upon a tax deed void upon its face. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Mason, 22 Colo.App. 612, 126 P. 1129; Munson v. Keim (Sup.) 127 P. 1026; Dimpfel v. Beam, 41 Colo. 25, 91 P. 1107; Page v. Gillett, 47 Colo. 289, 107 P. 290; Bloomer v. Cristler, 22 Colo.App. 238, 123 P. 966; Fleming v. Howell, supra.
Seven full years must intervene between the first payment of taxes and the commencement of the action,, to avail a defendant pleading the seven-years statute of limitations in the case of vacant and unoccupied land. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Howell (No. 3,586) 132 P. 387, citing Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Howell, 22 Colo.App. 584, 126 P. 1096.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Brownson
...its face (Johnson v. Gibson, 24 Colo.App. 392, 393, 133 P. 1052; Foster v. Gray, 24 Colo.App. 247-250, 133 P. 146; Callahan v. Reinhardt, 24 Colo.App. 199, 200, 132 P. 387); and, being void upon its face, it did not set in the five-year statute of limitation (Callahan v. Reinhardt, 24 Colo.......
-
Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. McPherin
... ... Johnson v. Gibson, 24 Colo.App. 392, 393, 133 P. 1052; Foster ... v. Gray, 24 Colo.App. 247-250, 136 P. 146; and Callahan v ... Reinhardt, 24 Colo.App. 199, 200, 132 P. 387 ... Any ... rights that might have accrued under this deed did not become ... ...
- Great Western Ry. Co. v. Drorbaugh