Cameron v. Baker
Decision Date | 02 January 1929 |
Docket Number | (No. 8095.) |
Citation | 13 S.W.2d 119 |
Parties | CAMERON, County Judge, v. BAKER et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Hidalgo County; J. E. Leslie, Judge.
Application for writ of mandamus by E. B. Baker and others to compel A. W. Cameron, County Judge, to canvass certain election returns. Writ issued, and respondent appeals. Affirmed.
Geo. P. Brown, of Edinburg, for appellant.
Strickland & Ewers, of Mission, and E. A. McDaniel, of McAllen, for appellees.
In this action appellees, E. B. Baker, A. J. Stephens, J. Wade, E. L. Etter, E. E. Black, Charles Atkins, and Worman Newton, resident taxpayers of Hidalgo county, applied for and obtained a writ of mandamus, commanding A. W. Cameron, county judge, appellant, to canvass certain election returns in regard to the incorporation of common school district No. 16, into an independent school district for free school purposes only, to be known as Ed Couch independent school district, and for the election of seven trustees.
The findings of fact of the trial judge are necessarily approved by this court, as no statement of facts appears in the record. The statement is partly copied herein, and a synopsis of the other portion is given in connection therewith:
An order of County Judge Cameron, revoking the order of election made by him, is copied at length, in which it is stated that the election order was rescinded because the petition signed by E. E. Black and 20 others, on which the order for the election was based, was not signed by 20 legally qualified resident voters of common school district No. 16. The order of revocation was not served on the judges of the election until on or about 8:30 a. m. on January 21,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Todd v. Helton
...act which may be obtained by mandamus. Grant v. Ammerman, 437 S.W.2d 547 (Tex.1969). The Perkins opinion quotes from Cameron v. Baker, 13 S.W.2d 119, 120 (Tex.Civ.App.1929, no writ) where it is said that the power to issue ex parte orders to election judges 'would be a dangerous power lodge......
-
Beyer v. Templeton
...order for an election, or refuse to canvass the election and declare the result. In the case of Cameron, County Judge, v. Baker et al., Tex.Civ.App., 13 S.W.2d 119, 120, the court asked the question, pertinent "Do the statutes authorize a county judge, after calling an election in the statu......
-
Perkins v. Ingalsbe
...was exhausted.' A case directly in point, except it is a school case rather than a city or town case, is the case of Cameron v. Baker, Tex.Civ.App.1929, 13 S.W.2d 119, 120, no writ history. The school statutes applicable provided that an election should be called by a county judge, upon pre......
-
State v. Rodriguez
...amendatory act has been given effect, without any question having been raised as to its validity or constitutionality. Cameron v. Baker, Tex.Civ.App., 13 S.W. 2d 119; Baker v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 26 S.W.2d 324; State v. Baker, 120 Tex. 307, 40 S.W.2d 41. This fact, of course, does not prec......