Cameron v. State, 45376
| Decision Date | 08 July 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 45376,45376 |
| Citation | 338 So.2d 817 |
| Parties | Patricia Lynn CAMERON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Robert J. Buonauro, Orlando, for petitioner.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
This is a petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal reported at 291 So.2d 222 (Fla.App.4th, 1974). The District Court certified the following question:
'Does the failure to grant a preliminary hearing unto a defendant in a criminal case where there has been an information filed constitute reversible error?'
We have jurisdiction. 1
The petitioner was charged by information on December 5, 1972, with possession of marijuana. She subsequently entered a plea of not guilty and on December 21, 1972, filed a motion for preliminary hearing pursuant to Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.122 (1972). The trial court denied the motion and subsequently the petitioner filed a motion to suppress tangible evidence which was also denied. The District Court affirmed without opinion the issues concerning the motion to suppress.
Subsequent to the certification of the question, the Supreme Court of the United States answered the question in Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 95 S.Ct. 854, 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975). We implemented the decision by amending this Court's Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131, 309 So.2d 544 (1975).
The record in this cause concerning the petitioner's application for bail on appeal reflects that she was not in custody. The denial of a preliminary hearing under the circumstances of this cause was correct and is affirmed.
Accordingly, the writ of certiorari is discharged.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McNamara v. State
...on the reservation of the specific, narrowly-drawn question of law. Cameron v. State, 291 So.2d 222 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), writ disch. 338 So.2d 817 (Fla.1976). Sub judice, appellant reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress the pistol and his motion to dismiss the inf......
-
Ward v. State, 89-03266
...Chapin v. State, 427 So.2d 812 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Cameron v. State, 291 So.2d 222 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), writ discharged, 338 So.2d 817 (Fla.1976). BOOTH, ZEHMER and WOLF, JJ., ...
-
Bell v. State, 78-878
...from the essential requirements of law for which no remedy is available upon plenary appeal. We are fully cognizant of Cameron v. State, 338 So.2d 817 (Fla.1976) which was decided subsequent to the adoption of the present rule. That case, however, was decided on its own peculiar facts and i......