Campbell v. Campbell, 12550

Citation550 S.W.2d 164
Decision Date20 April 1977
Docket NumberNo. 12550,12550
PartiesWilliam Bruner CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. Laura Fenner Williams CAMPBELL, Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas

Robert J. Hearon, Jr., Graves, Dougherty, Hearon, Moody & Garwood, Austin, for appellant.

Roy Q. Minton, John L. Foster, Minton, Burton & Fitzgerald, Inc., Austin, for appellee.

SHANNON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in a divorce suit. A threshold question concerns the finality of the judgment. We have concluded that the judgment is not final, and, as a result, we will dismiss the appeal.

In January, 1975, appellee, Laura Fenner Williams Campbell, filed suit for divorce against appellant, William Bruner Campbell, in the district court of Travis County. The parties were married in 1965 and they have two children. In March, 1975, the district court appointed appellee temporary managing conservator of the children and appointed appellant temporary possessory conservator of the children. In September, 1975, appellant, in violation of the court's order, removed the children from Travis County and concealed their location. In October, 1975, the district court entered judgment finding appellant to be in contempt and assessing punishment.

In June, 1976, the case came on for trial. At trial time the location of appellant and the children was still unknown to the court, to appellee, and to counsel for the parties. Appellant's counsel filed a motion for continuance based upon counsel's inability to represent his client in his client's absence. The district court overruled the motion.

After trial to the court, judgment was entered dissolving the marriage and awarding to appellee all of the community property and about one-half of appellant's separate property. By the terms of the judgment appellee was appointed managing conservator of the children. The judgment provided that appellant would have no rights with respect to the children ". . . pending further order of this Court . . ." and that no support payments for the children were to be ordered ". . . at the present time, subject to review by this Court at such time as the Respondent brings himself personally before this Court."

In connection with an interest in certain notes receivable awarded appellant, the judgment provided as follows:

"IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, however, with respect to the forementioned notes receivable awarded to the Respondent, that until such time as the Respondent, William Bruner Campbell, returns to the jurisdiction of this Court and submits himself to the orders of this Court, whether voluntarily or otherwise, the Petitioner, Laura Fenner Williams Campbell, shall have authority to manage and control such notes receivable for the benefit of the Respondent and the minor children of this marriage. The Petitioner is authorized to utilize such notes receivable and the income and proceeds therefrom, for the following purposes, and the following purposes only: (1) She may expend such funds for reasonable and necessary expenses in locating the minor children of this marriage, and returning the said children to the jurisdiction of this Court, (2) She may, and on request of the attorneys for the Respondent must, pay from such funds all costs and expenses necessarily incurred in the prosecution of an appeal from this judgment, and (3) She may, and on request of the attorneys for the Respondent must, pay all reasonable and necessary costs and expenses incurred in maintaining and preserving the property of the Respondent. The Petitioner shall maintain precise and accurate records of all such moneys received and expended, shall expend no funds for purposes other than those hereinabove set forth, and shall remain obligated to account for all such moneys received by her."

To be final a judgment must determine the rights of the parties and dispose of all issues involved so that no future action by the court will be necessary in order to settle and determine the entire...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Ho v. University of Texas at Arlington
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • November 4, 1998
    ...order rendered during a lawsuit which does not dispose of all issues regarding all parties is, of necessity, interlocutory. Campbell v. Campbell, 550 S.W.2d 164, 166 (Tex.Civ.App.--Austin 1977, no writ). Furthermore, when the terms of a final judgment conflict with those of an interlocutory......
  • Brown v. Brown
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • February 1, 1996
    ...are not accorded the presumption of finality. Zellers v. Barthel, 727 S.W.2d 364, 365 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 1987, no writ); Campbell v. Campbell, 550 S.W.2d 164, 166 (Tex.Civ.App.--Austin 1977, no writ); Stone v. Stone, 531 S.W.2d 850 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1975, no writ). See also Kelley v.......
  • Campbell v. Campbell
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • July 26, 1979
    ...of visitation and child support for later judicial determination was held to have rendered the judgment interlocutory. Campbell v. Campbell, 550 S.W.2d 164, 166 (Tex.Civ.App. Austin 1977, no A second hearing was held in July, 1977. Campbell appeared in person. He and the children were found......
  • Garrison v. Texas Commerce Bank
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • November 17, 1977
    ...of Domestic Relations was interlocutory. Angerstein v. Angerstein, 389 S.W.2d 519 (Tex.Civ.App. Corpus Christi 1965, no writ); Campbell v. Campbell, 550 S.W.2d 164 (Tex.Civ.App. Austin 1977, no writ history); Stone v. Stone, 531 S.W.2d 850 (Tex.Civ.App. Dallas 1975, no writ history); Hottel......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT