Campbell v. St. Louis Transit Co.

Citation99 S.W. 58,121 Mo. App. 406
PartiesCAMPBELL v. ST. LOUIS TRANSIT CO.
Decision Date08 January 1907
CourtCourt of Appeal of Missouri (US)

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Walter B. Douglas, Judge.

Action by Given Campbell against the St. Louis Transit Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.

Boyle, Priest & Lehman, for appellant. Guy A. Thompson, for respondent.

BLAND, P. J.

The appeal is from a judgment recovered by plaintiff in an action for personal injuries and damages to his automobile, caused by a collision with one of defendant's street cars, traveling west on Delmar avenue, on June 19, 1903, in the city of St. Louis. The evidence shows that Delmar avenue runs east and west, and at the time of the collision, defendant maintained and operated a double street car line in the center of said street; that King's Highway runs north and south and crosses Delmar avenue at right angles; that on the day of the accident, plaintiff was driving his automobile north on the east side of King's Highway (the west side being torn up for repairs) and when he arrived near the crossing of Delmar avenue, he turned to the west side of King's Highway, the better to enable him to see east on Delmar and to ascertain if a car was coming from that direction. Plaintiff testified that, from the west side of King's Highway, he could see 300 feet east on Delmar avenue and saw no car, and then turned back to the east side of the street and approached the crossing of Delmar at a speed of about six miles an hour, looking and listening all the while for a car; that when within about 40 feet of the tracks, he saw a car about 240 feet east, coming at a speed of from 25 to 30 miles per hour; that from the speed the car was traveling, he thought he could not clear the track in time to avoid a collision and immediately disconnected the power of his automobile, and did everything he could to stop it, but was unable to do so before it ran upon the track, where it was struck by the car, causing damages to the automobile and divers cuts, sprains, and injuries to himself. John Doyle, an experienced motorman, testified that a car running at a speed of 15 or 20 miles per hour could be stopped in from 100 to 125 feet, and one running at a speed of 25 or 30 miles per hour in from 125 to 150 feet. Plaintiff offered in evidence an ordinance of the city of St. Louis, limiting the speed of cars, at the point in question, to 15 miles per hour; also what is commonly known as the vigilant watch ordinance." The evidence tends to show that the automobile weighed about one ton, and plaintiff testified it was in perfect condition. William R. Morgan, a witness for defendant and an automobilist, testified that plaintiff's automobile, running at a speed of 15 miles per hour, could have been stopped in about thirty feet, and at a speed of 6 miles per hour in about 20 feet. Defendant's evidence tends to show that the automobile first came into view from behind a coal wagon when within 10 feet of the track, and when the car was about the same distance from the crossing, and that the automobile was running as fast as the car; that when it first came into view the motorman did everything in his...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Hockenberry v. Cooper County State Bank
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 18, 1935
    ...and which the lower court set aside. Sauer v. City of Kansas, 69 Mo. 46; Greenard v. Isaacson, 220 S.W. 694; Steyermark v. Landau, 121 Mo. App. 406, 99 S.W. 41. (8) Appellants deny that the claim forming the basis for the judgment under attack in this proceeding could have been successfully......
  • Keyes v. C.B. & Q. Railroad Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • September 4, 1930
    ...294 S.W. 1021; Hendry v. Judge, 211 Mo. App. 166; Brimer v. Davis, 211 Mo. App. 47; Cherry v. Railroad, 163 Mo. App. 53; Campbell v. Transit Co., 121 Mo. App. 406. See also Dougherty v. Railroad, 97 Mo. 647; Olsen v. Ry. Co., 152 Mo. 426; Longan v. Ry. Co., 183 Mo. 582; Orcutt v. Bldg. Co.,......
  • Hockenberry v. Cooper County State Bank of Bunceton
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 18, 1935
    ... ... Floesch Construction Co., 291 Mo. 34, 236 ... S.W. 332, 20 A. L. R. 1239; Gurley v. St. Louis Transit ... Co., 259 S.W. 895; Barrie v. United Rys. Co., ... 125 Mo.App. 96; Neff v. City of ... ...
  • Keyes v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • September 4, 1930
    ... ...           Appeal ... from Circuit Court of City of St. Louis; Hon. George E ... Mix , Judge ...           ... Affirmed ...           ... 166; Brimer v. Davis, 211 Mo.App. 47; ... Cherry v. Railroad, 163 Mo.App. 53; Campbell v ... Transit Co., 121 Mo.App. 406. See also Dougherty v ... Railroad, 97 Mo. 647; Olsen v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT