Campbell v. State
Decision Date | 05 February 1938 |
Citation | 131 Fla. 135,179 So. 137 |
Parties | CAMPBELL v. STATE. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Error to Criminal Court of Record, Dade County; Ben C. Willard Judge.
S Aiken Campbell was adjudged guilty of obtaining money under false pretense on his plea of guilty, and to review a judgment imposing sentence, he brings error.
Affirmed.
COUNSEL Kehoe & Kehoe, of Miami, for plaintiff in error.
Cary D Landis, Atty. Gen., and Roy Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The writ of error brings for review judgment of the criminal court of record in and for Dade county, Fla.
It is contended that because the defendant pleaded guilty and was adjudged guilty of the offense of obtaining money under false pretense in the criminal court of record or Dade county Fla., on the 16th day of March, 1934, the judgment reading as follows:
We hold that this case comes squarely within the purview of the enunciation of this court in the case of Josephine Carnagio et al. v. State, 106 Fla. 209, 143 So. 162, and on authority of the opinion and judgment in that case the judgment herein is affirmed.
So ordered.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pinkney v. State
...203, 45 So. 459, 14 Ann.Cas. 718; Ragland v. State, 55 Fla. 157, 46 So. 724; Carnagio v. State, 106 Fla. 209, 143 So. 162; Campbell v. State, 131 Fla. 135, 179 So. 137; Bronson v. State, 148 Fla. 188, 3 So.2d Inasmuch as the questions attempted to be raised on this appeal are so clearly unt......
- Kent v. Polk Grocery Co.
-
State v. Bateh
...are the following citations taken from the petition of the Attorney General: Carnagio v. State, 106 Fla. 209, 143 So. 162; Campbell v. State, 131 Fla. 135, 179 So. 137; Bronson v. State, 148 Fla. 188, 3 So.2d 873; Pinkney v. State, 160 Fla. 884, 37 So.2d 157; and Collingsworth v. Mayo, Fla.......
-
Bateh v. State
...54 Fla. 203, 45 So.2d 459, 462.6 All emphasis supplied by this court.7 Carnagio v. State, 106 Fla. 209, 143 So. 162, 164.8 Campbell v. State, 131 Fla. 135, 179 So. 137.9 148 Fla. 188, 3 So.2d 873, 874.10 160 Fla. 884, 37 So.2d 157, 158.11 See: Carnagio v. State, supra, note 7, wherein the F......