Campbell v. State

Decision Date13 December 2011
Docket NumberNo. 2010–CP–00655–COA.,2010–CP–00655–COA.
Citation75 So.3d 1160
PartiesClyde CAMPBELL, Appellant v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.
CourtMississippi Court of Appeals

75 So.3d 1160

Clyde CAMPBELL, Appellant
v.
STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.

No. 2010–CP–00655–COA.

Court of Appeals of Mississippi.

Dec. 13, 2011.


[75 So.3d 1160]

Clyde Campbell, appellant, pro se.

[75 So.3d 1161]

Office of the Attorney General by Deirdre McCrory, attorney for appellee.

Before IRVING, P.J., ISHEE and CARLTON, JJ.

ISHEE, J., for the Court:

¶ 1. Clyde Campbell, pro se, files this motion for post-conviction relief (PCR), claiming the Adams County Circuit Court erred when it dismissed his PCR motion as procedurally barred by Mississippi Code Annotated section 99–39–5(2) (Supp.2011). Finding the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to hear Campbell's PCR motion, we affirm the court's dismissal on other grounds.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. Campbell was found guilty of aggravated assault and sentenced on July 20, 1990, to life in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC), as a habitual offender, without eligibility for parole or probation. This Court affirmed his conviction on direct appeal in an unpublished opinion. Campbell v. State, 704 So.2d 465 (Miss.Ct.App.1997). Campbell had thrown gasoline on his girlfriend, Barbara Dukes, and deliberately lit a cigarette lighter, causing her to be engulfed in flames. Dukes did not die from the accident, but she did suffer serious injuries.

¶ 3. At the sentencing hearing, the State presented evidence to support Campbell's habitual-offender status. He pleaded guilty in 1974 to assault and battery with intent to kill after shooting a police officer with the Natchez Police Department. The officer lost an eye as a result of the shooting, and he later died as an indirect result of the injuries. Campbell was sentenced to serve five years in the custody of the MDOC, but he served a little more than a year in prison. The State also showed that Campbell had a previous conviction in 1981 for carrying a concealed weapon by a felon. For that crime, Campbell was sentenced to five years in the custody of the MDOC and again served a little over a year in prison.

¶ 4. Campbell's trial counsel objected to the introduction of the evidence, arguing that the convictions had occurred more than ten years before the current charge; therefore, they could not be considered for purposes of determining habitual-offender status. The circuit court overruled the objection, noting that the rule Campbell's trial counsel referenced applied to evidence used during the course of the trial, but it was not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • State v. Childs
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • 12 Mayo 2020
    ...relief in the circuit court." Doss v. State , 126 So. 3d 1026, 1028 (¶6) (Miss. Ct. App. 2013) (emphasis added) (quoting Campbell v. State , 75 So. 3d 1160, 1161-62 (¶7) (Miss. Ct. App. 2011) ). "This procedure is not merely advisory, but jurisdictional." Chandler v. State , 190 So. 3d 509,......
  • Campbell v. State, 2015–CP–00595–COA.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • 21 Junio 2016
  • Howard v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • 7 Abril 2015
    ...permission from the Mississippi Supreme Court must be obtained in order to seek post-conviction relief in the circuit court.” Campbell v. State, 75 So.3d 1160, 1161–62 (¶ 7) (Miss.Ct.App.2011) (citing Miss.Code Ann. § 99–39–7 (Supp.2013) ).¶ 11. Howard contends that these issues are not sub......
  • Chandler v. State, 2014–CP–00114–COA.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • 23 Febrero 2016
    ... ... and an order granted allowing the filing of such motion in the trial court. Miss.Code Ann. 99397 (Rev.2015) (emphasis added). This procedure is not merely advisory, but jurisdictional. Dunaway v. State, 111 So.3d 117, 118 ( 6) (Miss.Ct.App.2013) (quoting Campbell v. State, 75 So.3d 1160, 1162 ( 7) (Miss.Ct.App.2011) ). 7. Furthermore, [the Supreme] Court has held that the dismissal of an appeal because it was not perfected in the time and manner required by law has the effect of affirming the appellant's conviction and sentence. Jones v. State, 64 So.3d ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT