Cangro v. Cangro
Decision Date | 01 May 2000 |
Citation | 272 A.D.2d 286,707 N.Y.S.2d 895 |
Parties | JENNIFER CANGRO, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>FRANK F. CANGRO, Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.
Despite the plaintiff wife's denomination of her successive motions as motions to vacate prior orders of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, on the ground of fraud, the motions were, in actuality, for reargument. Therefore, the order denying those motions is not appealable (see, Mucciola v City of New York, 177 AD2d 553).
A court may impose a sanction sua sponte, but the party to be sanctioned must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to be heard (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [d]). Here, the plaintiff was not afforded such an opportunity (see, Walker v Weinstock, 213 AD2d 631).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jovanovic v. Jovanovic
...Cunningham v. Diers, 14 A.D.3d 528, 529, 787 N.Y.S.2d 668;Agayeva v. KJ Shuttle Serv., 284 A.D.2d 488, 726 N.Y.S.2d 584;Cangro v. Cangro, 272 A.D.2d 286, 707 N.Y.S.2d 895;Mucciola v. City of New York, 177 A.D.2d 553, 554, 576 N.Y.S.2d 291). Furthermore, the Supreme Court providently exercis......
-
Tricarico v. Baer
...the case" (see Wagner v. Goldberg, 293 A.D.2d 527, 528, 739 N.Y.S.2d 850, 851 [2nd Dept. July 24, 2002]; Cangro v. Cangro, 272 A.D.2d 286, 707 N.Y.S.2d 895 [2nd Dept.2000]). Based on the forgoing, the Court will conduct a hearing at the conclusion of this case at which time Mr, Walsh will b......
-
Barr v. Attorney Gen. of State
...of the case" (see, Wagner v. Goldberg, 293 A.D.2d 527, 528, 739 N.Y.S.2d 850, 851 [2nd Dept. July 24, 2002] ; Cangro v. Cangro, 272 A.D.2d 286, 707 N.Y.S.2d 895 [2nd Dept.2000] ).It must be proven that Mr. Barr is indeed the author of these missives. In these days of identity theft, the Cou......
-
Barr v. Attorney Gen. of State
...of the case" (see, Wagner v. Goldberg, 293 AD2d 527, 528, 739 N.Y.S.2d 850, 851 [2nd Dept. July 24, 2002]; Cangro v. Cangro, 272 AD2d 286, 707 N.Y.S.2d 895 [2nd Dept.2000]). It must be proven that Mr. Barr is indeed the author of these missives. In these days of identity theft, the Court is......