Cannon v. Cannon, 34960
| Decision Date | 25 September 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 34960,34960 |
| Citation | 244 Ga. 299,260 S.E.2d 19 |
| Parties | CANNON v. CANNON. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Finestone & Cardon, Wayne L. Cardon, Atlanta, for appellant.
Charles A. Evans, Marietta, for appellee.
In this case, a North Carolina judgment based upon a contract of separation was incorporated into a Georgia divorce decree on the issues of alimony, child support and custody at the wife's request and over the husband's objection. See Shepherd v. Shepherd, 241 Ga. 484, 246 S.E.2d 183 (1978). The North Carolina contract, which included a provision not to contest a later divorce, is clearly void as against the public policy of this state. Birch v. Anthony, 109 Ga. 349, 34 S.E. 561 (1899). The issue here is whether that North Carolina judgment is nevertheless entitled to full faith and credit. We hold that it is and affirm.
In Campbell v. Campbell, 231 Ga. 214, 200 S.E.2d 899 (1973), we held that an Indiana consent judgment on a separation agreement settling the issues of alimony, child support and child custody was entitled to full faith and credit. Estin v. Estin, 334 U.S. 541, 68 S.Ct. 1213, 92 L.Ed. 1561 (1948); Coe v. Coe, 334 U.S. 378, 68 S.Ct. 1094, 92 L.Ed. 1451 (1947). See Sherrer v. Sherrer, 334 U.S. 343, 68 S.Ct. 1087, 1097, 92 L.Ed. 1429 (1947); Davis v. Davis, 305 U.S. 32, 59 S.Ct. 3, 83 L.Ed. 26 (1938). That here the North Carolina consent judgment contains a clause making it void as against the public policy of this state does not change this rule. It is clear that local policy considerations must give way to this constitutional provision. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt, 320 U.S. 430, 64 S.Ct. 208, 88 L.Ed. 149 (1943). For example, in Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230, 28 S.Ct. 641, 52 L.Ed. 1039 (1907), a Missouri judgment was entitled to full faith and credit in Mississippi even though it was based on a gambling debt unenforceable in Mississippi. The trial court correctly recognized that the North Carolina alimony judgment was entitled to full faith and credit and did not err in incorporating it in the divorce decree.
The motion to dismiss is denied.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Four Seasons Gardening & Landscaping, Inc. v. Crouch
...in the courts of that state. Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230, 237, 28 S.Ct. 641, 643, 52 L.Ed. 1039 (1908); Cannon v. Cannon, 244 Ga. 199, 260 S.E.2d 19, 20 (1979); Conquistador Hotel Corp. v. Fortino, 99 Wis.2d 16, 298 N.W.2d 236, 238 (1980); and Rich v. Con-Stan Industries, 449 S.W.2d 323......
-
Amerireach.com, LLC v. Walker
...but “no roving ‘public policy exception’ to the full faith and credit due judgments ” (emphasis in original)); Cannon v. Cannon, 244 Ga. 299, 260 S.E.2d 19 (1979). Furthermore, the Texas judgment does go to the merits of, and adversely controls, Dr. Walker's claim that the forum selection c......
- Johnson v. State, 34955
-
Thomas v. Whaley
...order must be afforded full faith and credit in this state even if that order were violative of our public policy, Cannon v. Cannon, 244 Ga. 299, 260 S.E.2d 19 (1979), nothing prevents our application of OCGA § 19-6-19(a) to protect this state's residents and public policy. See also for exa......