Capelle v. Brainard

Decision Date31 March 1873
PartiesJOHN P. CAPELLE, Appellant, v. SAMUEL S. BRAINARD, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court.

H. Berry, for Appellant.

Horatio D. Wood, for Respondent.

No question of law having been raised, this case cannot be reviewed by the Supreme Court. (Wielandy vs. Lemuel, 47 Mo., 322; Gradalph vs. Fink, 47 Mo., 291.)

VORIES, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was brought in the St. Louis Circuit Court, to recover the amount of three judgments, rendered before a Justice of the Peace. The defense was, that the judgments had been paid and satisfied by the defendant. The evidence strongly tended to sustain the defendants answer. No objections were taken to any of the evidence by the appellant on the trial. The case was tried by the Court by the consent of parties; no instructions were asked, or given. The Court rendered a judgment for the defendant. The appellant appealed to General Term, and from which an appeal was taken to this Court.

The record in this case presents nothing for the consideration of this Court, no exceptions having been saved, on the trial, to the rulings of the Circuit Court; the single exception saved is to the action of the Court in overruling the appellant's motion for a new trial, which can only authorize this Court, under the records in the cause, to decide as to the weight of the evidence given upon the trial of the case in the Circuit Court. This Court has uniformly refused to decide as to the weight of the evidence, where there was evidence on both sides. (Wielandy vs. Lemuel, 47 Mo., 322; Gradalph vs. Fink, 47 Mo., 291.)

There was evidence in this case, which strongly, if not conclusively, tended to prove the defendant's answer, and the finding was for the defendant, which will not be disturbed by this Court.

The other Judges concurring, the Judgment of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Newell v. St. Louis Bolt & Iron Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • February 5, 1878
    ...Buckner v. Jones, 1 Mo. App. 538; German National Bank v. Studley, 1 Mo. App. 260. Appellate courts will not weigh evidence.-- Capelle v. Brainard, 52 Mo. 479; Beattie v. Hill, 60 Mo. 72; Edwards v. Cary, 60 Mo. 572; The State to use v. Bressler, 56 Mo. 350; Thompson v. Russell, 30 Mo. 498;......
  • Callaway v. Woodward
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • December 24, 1887
    ...has no power to review the finding of facts in actions at law. Beck v. Pollard, 55 Mo. 26; Oakes v. Ins. Co., 52 Mo. 237; Capelle v. Brainard, 52 Mo. 479. II. The court committed no error in the instructions given on behalf of respondent, nor in refusing the one asked by defendants. There w......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT