Carey v. Commissioner of Correction

Decision Date03 January 2005
Citation272 Conn. 915,866 A.2d 1283
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesCHARLES CAREY v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

The petitioner Charles Carey's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 180 (AC 24655), is denied.

Kirstin B. Coffin, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Franko v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • May 17, 2016
    ...quotation marks omitted.) Carey v. Commissioner of Correction, 86 Conn. App. 180, 182, 860 A.2d 776 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 915, 866 A.2d 1283 (2005). "In an appeal from the denial of a habeas writ, the burden imposed upon the petitioner is higher than that imposed on him in a direc......
  • Ramos v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • April 18, 2017
    ...and voluntarily given." Carey v. Commissioner of Correction , 86 Conn.App. 180, 185–86, 860 A.2d 776 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 915, 866 A.2d 1283 (2005). "Accordingly, we conclude that the petitioner has failed to show that this claim involves issues that are debatable among jurists o......
  • Bigelow v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • August 1, 2017
    ...quotation marks omitted.) Carey v. Commissioner of Correction , 86 Conn.App. 180, 185, 860 A.2d 776 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 915, 866 A.2d 1283 (2005).9 "It is appropriate to presume that in most cases counsel routinely explains the consequences of a plea agreement." Toles v. Commiss......
  • Toles v. Commissioner of Correction
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • April 14, 2009
    ...quotation marks omitted.) Carey v. Commissioner of Correction, 86 Conn.App. 180, 185, 860 A.2d 776 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 915, 866 A.2d 1283 (2005).5 It is appropriate to presume that in most cases routinely explains the consequences of a plea agreement. See State v. Stith, 108 Con......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT