Carlton v. Paxton, 0887-90-3
| Decision Date | 20 October 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 0887-90-3,0887-90-3 |
| Citation | 15 Va.App. 265,422 S.E.2d 423 |
| Parties | Richard CARLTON, Appellant, v. William Lewis PAXTON, Jr. and Angela Paxton, Appellees. Record |
| Court | Virginia Court of Appeals |
Upon a Rehearing En Banc.
Laurence A. Mann, Lexington, for appellant.
J. Gregory Mooney, Covington (Collins & Mooney, on briefs), for appellee William Lewis Paxton, Jr.
No brief or argument, for appellee Angela Paxton.
Before KOONTZ, C.J., and BAKER, BARROW, BENTON, COLEMAN, MOON, WILLIS, ELDER, BRAY and FITZPATRICK, JJ.
On March 17, 1992, a panel of this Court reversed and remanded the trial court's order dismissing Richard Carlton's bill of complaint. 14 Va.App. 105, 415 S.E.2d 600 (1992). A dissenting opinion was filed in the panel decision. Carlton's petition for rehearing en banc was granted and heard on September 23, 1992. For the reasons stated in the panel's majority opinion, the decision of the trial court is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Circuit Court of Alleghany County.
Judge Barrow and Judge Willis would affirm the trial court's decision for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of the original panel decision.
This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lundmark v. Commonwealth
...110, 415 S.E.2d 600 (citing Avery v. Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 192 Va. 329, 333, 64 S.E.2d 767 (1951) ) adopted upon reh'g en banc , 15 Va. App. 265, 422 S.E.2d 423 (1992). "[T]he purpose of the notice of appeal is merely to place the opposing party on notice and to direct the clerk to prepare the r......
-
Wise v. Williams
...This court has interpreted such timeliness provisions strictly." (citations omitted)), adopted by the court en banc, --- Va.App. ----, 422 S.E.2d 423 (Va.Ct.App.1992); cf. Whitley v. Bair, 802 F.2d 1487, 1502 n. 31 (4th Cir.1986) ("Virginia courts have consistently applied their procedural ......
-
Lundmark v. Commonwealth
...110, 415 S.E.2d 600 (citing Avery v. Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 192 Va. 329, 333, 64 S.E.2d 767 (1951) ) adopted upon reh'g en banc , 15 Va. App. 265, 422 S.E.2d 423 (1992). "[T]he purpose of the notice of appeal is merely to place the opposing party on notice and to direct the clerk to prepare the r......
-
Watkins v. Fairfax County
...11, 1990 adoption order but erroneously referred to order being appealed as one entered on April 22, 1986), aff'd en banc, 15 Va.App. 265, 422 S.E.2d 423 (1992)). "Rather, it was a failure to comply with a requirement made mandatory by both statute and rule." Id.; cf. Greif Companies v. Hen......