Carneal v. Carneal, 5D04-1049.
Decision Date | 21 May 2004 |
Docket Number | No. 5D04-1049.,5D04-1049. |
Citation | 873 So.2d 562 |
Parties | Robert CARNEAL, Sr., Petitioner, v. Alyson CARNEAL, Respondent. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Patricia K. Herman, Orlando, for Petitioner.
Michael J. Barber of Michael J. Barber, P.A., Kissimmee, and Marcia K. Lippincott of Marcia K. Lippincott, P.A., Lake Mary, for Respondent.
Robert Carneal, Sr., ("the former husband"), petitions for a writ of prohibition to prevent the trial court from conducting a hearing relating to the sale of a marital residence which is the subject of a pending appeal in this court. Because the trial court has done nothing except schedule a hearing at the request of a litigant, we deny the petition.
A hearing was scheduled for April 5, 2004, at the request of the former wife, to hear arguments on her "Motion for Enforcement of Final Judgment Regarding Refinancing of Former Marital Residence." Although counsel for the former husband informed the trial court that a matter related to the scheduled motion had been appealed, the trial court indicated that the hearing would take place. The former husband then filed this petition and this court entered an order to show cause which operated as a stay of the enforcement proceedings.
The rule limiting trial court jurisdiction pending an appeal provides:
(1) The lower tribunal shall retain jurisdiction to enter and enforce orders awarding separate maintenance, child support, alimony, attorneys' fees and costs for services rendered in the lower tribunal, temporary attorneys' fees and costs reasonably necessary to prosecute or defend an appeal, or other awards necessary to protect the welfare and rights of any party pending appeal.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Italiano v. Italiano
-
Ppi, Inc. v. Dept. of Bus. & Prof. Reg., 1D05-2699.
...1st DCA 1978) (denying prohibition relief where the petition did not show that an agency order had been entered); Carneal v. Carneal, 873 So.2d 562 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (denying a petition for writ of prohibition where the trial court merely scheduled a hearing and there was no action from w......