Carpenter v. Jamison
| Decision Date | 30 April 1882 |
| Parties | CARPENTER, Appellant, v. JAMISON. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.
AFFIRMED.
Wm. B. Thompson and Henderson & Shields for appellant.D. D. Burnes and Geo. W. Cline for respondent.
For the reasons assigned by the court of appeals in its opinion delivered in this case, the judgment of that court is affirmed.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
12 cases
-
Hahs v. Cape Girardeau & Chester Railroad Company
...the contractual obligation may not be contradicted or overthrown by parole testimony. [Carpenter v. Jamison, 6 Mo.App. 216; Carpenter v. Jamison, 75 Mo. 285; v. Reynolds, 52 N.Y. (Supr. Ct.) 145; 24 Am. and Eng. Ency. Law (2 Ed.), 283; 23 Am. and Eng. Ency. Law (2 Ed.), 978; Davison v. Davi......
-
Hahs v. Cape Girardeau & C. R. Co.
...the contractual obligation may not be contradicted or overthrown by parol testimony. Carpenter v. Jamison, 6 Mo. App. 216; Carpenter v. Jamison, 75 Mo. 285; Randall v. Reynolds, 52 N. Y. Super. Ct. 145; 24 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law (2d Ed.) 283; 23 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law (2d Ed.) 978; Davison v. D......
-
Raicher v. National Bank of Commerce In St. Louis
...which cannot be altered or enlarged by parol testimony. Interurban Cons. Co. v. Hayes, 191 Mo. 248; Carpenter v. Jamison, 6 Mo.App. 216, 75 Mo. 285; Blakely v. Benecke, 59 193; 22 C. J. 1138, note 32. (6) Parol evidence is not admissible which seeks to nullify, modify or change the characte......
-
Ellis v. Harrison
... ... Parol ... testimony will not be permitted to vary or change such ... partnership contract as against plaintiff. Carpenter v ... Jamison, 75 Mo. 285; Jennings v. Brizadine, 44 ... Mo. 335; Bond v. Worley, 26 Mo. 253; Lone v ... Price, 5 Mo. 101; Tracy v. Iron Works, ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results