Carpenters and Joiners Union, Etc. v. Ritter's Cafe
Citation | 149 S.W.2d 694 |
Decision Date | 06 February 1941 |
Docket Number | No. 11150.,11150. |
Parties | CARPENTERS AND JOINERS UNION OF AMERICA, LOCAL NO. 213, et al. v. RITTER'S CAFE et al. |
Court | Court of Appeals of Texas |
Appeal from District Court, Harris County; Ewing Boyd, Judge.
Suit by Ritter's Cafe and others against the Carpenters and Joiners Union of America, Local No. 213, and others, to enjoin defendants from picketing, or causing to be picketed, plaintiff's place of business. From a judgment granting a permanent injunction, defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
Sewall Myer and Frank Campbell Fourmy, both of Houston, for appellants.
Bernard A. Golding and Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Francis, all of Houston, for appellees.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Harris County granting an application of appellees, Ritter's Cafe and E. R. Ritter, for a permanent injunction restraining appellants, Carpenters and Joiners Union of America, Local No. 213, and Painters Local Union No. 130, and their members, from picketing or causing to be picketed, and from carrying certain banners and placards upon the sidewalks in front of appellees' place of business at 418 Broadway in Houston, Texas.
Appellants answered by general demurrer, general denial and exceptions. They admitted that they had peacefully picketed appellees' place of business, but contended that, in doing so, they were exercising their rights of free speech and freedom of the press and that any judgment enjoining them from exercising such rights would be a violation and abridgment of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Section 8 of the Bill of Rights of the State of Texas, Vernon's Ann.St.Const.
This is the second appeal to this court in this action. The first appeal, which is reported under the same title in 138 S.W.2d 223, 224, was from an order of the district court of Harris County temporarily enjoining appellants herein from the carrying of the placards complained of and from picketing appellees' place of business. Appellants then, as in this appeal, contended that any action by the court abridging their rights of expressing their views by means of placards on the public sidewalks and from picketing appellees' place of business would constitute an abridgment of their right of free speech.
This appeal involves the right of a court of equity to permanently enjoin a labor organization from picketing and from expressing their views upon a situation affecting themselves by means of banners and placards on the sidewalk in front of an establishment with which they have no labor dispute and where it is proven that such actions are injurious and prejudicial to the business and property rights of the complaining parties.
Upon a hearing of appellees' evidence— no evidence was offered by appellants—it was agreed by the parties that the fact findings, as set out in the opinion of this court in the first appeal herein, were the true facts in the case. On the request of appellees for findings of fact the trial court filed said findings as his findings of fact and conclusions of law. They are as follows:
"`This Place is Unfair to Carpenters and Joiners Union of America, Local No. 213, and Painters Local No. 130, Affiliated With American Federation of Labor.' "(8) That plaintiff at all times material hereto, and for a long time prior theretofore, had employed no carpenters or painters at his said cafe.
Article 5152, Revised Statutes of 1925, provides that it shall be lawful for any and all persons engaged in any kind of work or labor to associate themselves together and to form trade unions and other organizations for the purpose of protecting themselves in their respective pursuits and employments.
Article 5153 provides that it shall be lawful for any member of such trade union or other organization to induce or to attempt to induce, by peaceful and lawful means, any person to accept any particular employment or to enter or refuse to enter or relinquish any employment or pursuit in which such person may be engaged, but that such member or members shall not have the right to invade or trespass upon the premises of another without the consent of the owner thereof.
Article 4642, Section 1, Revised Statutes of 1925, provides for injunctive relief "where the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Giboney v. Empire Storage Ice Co
...of Civil Appeals of Texas had not mentioned the Texas antitrust laws in its first or second opinion in the Ritter case. 138 S.W.2d 223, 149 S.W.2d 694. A third opinion, denying rehearing, did make reference for the first time to the state's antitrust laws, but did not definitely point out i......
-
International Brotherhood v. Missouri Pac. Fr. Tr. Co.
...109 S.W.2d 301, writ granted by subsequently dismissed as being moot: 133 Tex. 624, 130 S.W.2d 282; Carpenters & Joiners Union of America v. Ritter's Cafe, Tex.Civ.App., 149 S.W.2d 694; Borden Co. v. Teamsters' Union, Tex.Civ.App., 152 S.W.2d 828; and International Union of Operating Engine......
-
Carpenters and Joiners Union of America, Local No 213 v. Ritter Cafe
...construction by Plaster) nor communication of the facts of the dispute by any means other than the picketing of Ritter's restaurant. 149 S.W.2d 694. We brought the case here to consider the claim that the decree of the Court of Civil Appeals (the Supreme Court of Texas having refused a writ......
-
Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers v. Wamix, Inc., of Dallas
...... will be referred to in this opinion as Union and Wamix, respectively. . In ... peace against violence, mass picketing, etc., unless it is made to appear that the N.L.R.B. ...Local Union No. 47, etc., supra; Carpenters and Joiners Union, etc. v. Ritter's Cafe, ......