Carradus v. Lange
Decision Date | 17 January 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 55143,55143 |
Citation | 203 N.W.2d 565 |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Parties | Phillip E. CARRADUS and Nancy R. Carradus, Appellees, v. Curtis Kent LANGE and Jack Donald Lange, Appellants. |
David F. McGuire, Cedar Rapids, for appellants.
Francis J. Pruss, Cedar Rapids, for appellees.
Heard before MOORE, C.J., and MASON, RAWLINGS, REES and HARRIS, JJ.
From judgment on jury verdict for plaintiffs in personal injury actions arising from motor vehicle collision the defendants appeal challenging damage award to one plaintiff alone. We reverse and remand for a limited new trial.
The instant accident occurred about 5:15 p.m., July 16, 1967, on primary Highway #20 at a point about 350 feet west of the westerly limits of Independence in Buchanan County.
Plaintiffs, Phillip E. Carradus and Nancy R. Carradus, were rear seat passengers in a Plymouth owned and driven by Gerald M. Connelly. Because of a turning vehicle ahead the Plymouth slowed and was struck from the rear by a Chevrolet owned by defendant Jack Donald Lange, operated by defendant Curtis Kent Lange. Plaintiffs were resultantly injured.
Plaintiffs brought individual actions for damages aainst defendants which culminated in a judgment for each plaintiff. Motion by defendants for a new trial was overruled.
On appeal only the damage award to Nancy R. Carradus is contested. She will therefore be here referred to as plaintiff and our review accordingly limited.
Errors asserted in support of a reversal are, trial court erred in (1) permitting plaintiff to testimonially state her pretrial total cumulative loss of earnings, (2) submitting jury instructions regarding plaintiff's 'permanent injury', disability, impairment of earning capacity and diminution of services as a wife and mother, (3) giving instructions to the jury as to future pain and suffering without any time limitation, (4) the submission of instructions regarding impairment of earning capacity and diminution of wife-mother services absent adequate proof, (5) overemphasizing the damage element by instructions given, and (6) overruling defendants' new trial motion.
These issues will not be considered in the order assigned.
In course of trial plaintiff's income tax returns for 1963 through 1969 were prefatorily admitted in evidence, and later taken to the jury room. Plaintiff also related her injury associated loss of time in remunerative employment and the manner by which her services as a wife and mother had been diminished. She also described in some detail the pain experienced by her prior to and at time of trial.
Finally, on direct examination, she was asked this question: 'Well, are you able to state exactly how much earnings loss you have had as a result of your injuries in this collision that occurred on July 16, 1967, Mrs. Carradus?'
Defendants then interposed the objection:
Noticeably, the questions quoted above called for nothing more than a yes or no answer. So the objection voiced was both inappropriate and premature. Furthermore, no motion was made to strike the response given as a voluntary statement. Thus the answer remained for consideration. Stated otherwise, error, if any, was waived. See Harrison v. Ulicki, 193 N.W.2d 533, 537 (Iowa 1972); Patton v. Town of Sanborn, 133 Iowa 650, 654, 110 N.W. 1032 (1907). See also 1 Wigmore on Evidence, § 18 at 344 (3d ed.); 3 Jones on Evidence, § 895 (4th ed.).
Initially defendants urge the evidence was not sufficiently definite to justify an instruction on impairment of earning capacity.
At the outset we find no merit in the position thus taken by defendants.
Dr. Robb, attending specialist in orthopedic surgery, testifying for plaintiff, stated she incurred an injury related sprain of the lumbar and cervical spine, described the activity restricting pain experienced by her together with his examination and treatments administered.
The doctor also testified:
'The pain which I made reference to which she will experience for some months in the future I think in my opinion it will eventually completely disappear.'
'Based on reasonable medical certainty the cause of the injury and cause of the condition which I found in Mrs. Carradus in my earlier examination and in the examination December, 1970, was the accident that she had incurred in July, 1967; this was the cause of the symptoms for which I had examined her in July of 1967 and subsequently re-examined her in December, 1970.'
Plaintiff's testimony discloses she secured employment in 1970 at Anamosa with Head Start. This six hour a day job required that she check on small children, take them to the doctor or dentist and deal with their parents. It paid $224 a month, plus ten cents a mile. Plaintiff further testified in part:
Dispositive of the loss of earning capacity issue is this statement in Anthes v Anthes, 258 Iowa 260, 269--270, 139 N.W.2d 201, 208 (1965):
See also Andrews v. Struble, 178 N.W.2d 391, 403 (Iowa 1970); 22 Am.Jur.2d, Damages, §§ 313, 315--316; 25 C.J.S. Damages § 40; Annot., 18 A.L.R.3d 88.
With regard to diminution of plaintiff's services as a wife and mother, this court said in Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc., 170 N.W.2d 632, 656--657 (Iowa 1969):
'In Henneman v. McCalla, supra (260 Iowa 60, 78, 148 N.W.2d 447, 458 (1967)), we approved this from Bridenstine v. Iowa City Elec. R. Co., 181 Iowa 1124, 1134, 165 N.W. 435, 439:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Schnebly v. Baker
...of pecuniary measurement by witnesses and must be left to the sound judgment of the fact-finder, based on the evidence. Carradus v. Lange, 203 N.W.2d 565 (Iowa); Jackson v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. Ry., 238 Iowa 1253, 30 N.W.2d Was an allowance for pain and suffering warranted by the eviden......
-
McNeely v. Henry
...recover damages where her capacity to perform household services has been impaired due to the negligence of another. See Carradus v. Lange, 203 N.W.2d 565 (Iowa 1973) (holding a jury issue was adequately generated regarding plaintiff's right to damages for impairment of earning capacity and......
-
Bitzan v. Parisi
...Arkansas Drilling Co. v. Gross, 179 Ark. 631, 17 S.W.2d 889 (1929); Loper v. Morrison, 23 Cal.2d 600, 145 P.2d 1 (1944); Carradus v. Lange, 203 N.W.2d 565 (Iowa 1973); Nelson v. Tworoger, 256 Or. 189, 472 P.2d 802 (1970); Annot. 18 A.L.R.3d 10 (1968); Cf. Carr v. Martin, 35 Wash.2d 753, 759......
-
Hysell v. Iowa Public Service Co., s. 76-1744
...N.W.2d at 792; Schnebly v. Baker, supra, 217 N.W.2d at 726; Anthes v. Anthes, 258 Iowa 260, 139 N.W.2d 201, 208 (1965); Carradus v. Lange, 203 N.W.2d 565, 568 (Iowa 1973). This is distinct from any recovery for pain and suffering or disability. See Schnebly v. Baker, supra, 217 N.W.2d at 72......