CARRIER TRANSICOLD v. SOUTHEAST APPRAISAL, A98A0431.
Citation | 504 S.E.2d 25,233 Ga. App. 176 |
Decision Date | 30 June 1998 |
Docket Number | No. A98A0431.,A98A0431. |
Parties | CARRIER TRANSICOLD DIVISION v. SOUTHEAST APPRAISAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES, INC. |
Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Long, Weinberg, Ansley & Wheeler, Mary D. Owens, Carol P. Michel, Atlanta, for appellant.
Thomas P. Stamps, Atlanta, for appellee.
Carrier Corporation is a Delaware corporation registered to do business in Georgia, and its registered agent for service of process is C.T. Corporation System. Carrier Transicold Division is not a legal entity, but is a division of Carrier Corporation.
Plaintiff Southeast Appraisal Resource Associates, Inc. filed this action on an open account, naming as defendant Carrier Transicold Division. The complaint and summons were served on C.T. Corporation System as the registered agent for service, and the documents were returned to plaintiff's attorney with the explanation that C.T. Corporation System was not the registered agent for service for a company by the name of Carrier Transicold Division.
Pursuant to plaintiff's motion, default judgment was entered against Carrier Transicold Division. After Carrier Corporation learned of the default judgment, it entered a limited appearance to petition the state court to set aside the default judgment. The state court denied the motion to set aside judgment, and this Court granted Carrier Corporation's application seeking permission to file a discretionary appeal. Held:
"It is a fundamental tenet of due process that a defendant have notice of suit in accordance with law." Castellana v. Conyers Toyota, 200 Ga.App. 161, 162(1), 163, 407 S.E.2d 64. One of the alternative methods of providing such notice to a corporate defendant is by service on a registered agent. See OCGA § 9-11-4(d). The practical result of this statutory provision is the creation of a business, that is, the business of serving as registered agent. An entity in this business might serve as registered agent for any number of corporations. When such an entity is served with a lawsuit, it must determine if the named defendant is among its clients. If the named defendant is recognized as a client, the summons and complaint are forwarded to the client. This process is simple where the client is clearly named as defendant in a lawsuit. But the process can become more complex. John L. Hutcheson Mem. Tri-County Hosp. v. Oliver, 120 Ga.App. 547(1), 171 S.E.2d 649. Thus, the entity in the business of serving as registered agent must be prepared to recognize the trade names of its clients and also to recognize some misstatements of its clients names. See Miller v. U.S. Shelter Corp. of Delaware, 179 Ga.App. 469, 471-473(2, 3), 347 S.E.2d 251. " ...
To continue reading
Request your trial- MEADOW RIVER LUMBER v. Univ. of Ga. Research
-
Red Sun Farms v. United States
...conducting business in a trade name may sue or be sued in [its] trade name." (quoting Carrier Transicold Div. v. Southeast Appraisal Resource Assocs. , 233 Ga.App. 176, 504 S.E.2d 25, 26 (1998) ). If Red Sun Farms lacks capacity to sue under appropriate state law, the question arises whethe......
-
National Office Partners, L.P. v. Stanley
...that it could not have been, or was not, misled." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Carrier Transicold Div. v. Southeast Appraisal Resource Assoc., 233 Ga.App. 176, 177, 504 S.E.2d 25 (1998). In determining whether a misnomer is immaterial, the substantive provisions of the complaint con......
-
Mitsubishi Motors v. ROBINSON & STEPHENS
...the wrong address and that Mitsubishi never received any notice. OCGA § 40-11-5(2), (4)(A); Carrier Transicold Div. v. Southeast Appraisal Resource Assoc., 233 Ga.App. 176, 177, 504 S.E.2d 25 (1998). Robinson received three addresses with the title information; at the minimum, Robinson shou......