Carroll Tp. Bd. of Supervisors v. Department of Environmental Resources

• Decision Date: 10 August 1994
• Citation: 166 Pa.Cmwlth. 562,646 A.2d 738
• Parties: CARROLL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, Respondent.
• Court: Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court

Page 738

646 A.2d 738

166 Pa.Cmwlth. 562

CARROLL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 13, 1994.

Decided Aug. 10, 1994.

Christina M. Veltri, for petitioner.

Marylou Barton, Asst. Counsel, for respondent.

Before CRAIG, President Judge, and DOYLE, McGINLEY, PELLEGRINI, FRIEDMAN, KELLEY and NEWMAN, JJ.

CRAIG, President Judge.

The Carroll Township Board of Supervisors (township) appeals an order of the Environmental Hearing Board (board) dismissing the township's appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources (department) requiring the township to adopt certain ordinances pertaining to sewage facilities planning.

The township presents the following issues on review: 1) whether local governments, such as the township, are the exclusive bodies vested with legislative authority in planning, zoning, and other such functions and thus have the authority to approve subdivision of land, without sewer module approval, where there is no proposed or contemplated generation of sewage; 2) whether the department has the authority to order the township to adopt ordinances requiring sewer module approval from the department, before the township approves subdivision of land; 3) whether the department's order constitutes a taking without just compensation; 4) whether the department's order is unreasonable under the circumstances of this case; and 5) whether the board erred, generally, in denying the township's appeal.

FACTS

The facts, as averred in the pleadings, and as found by the board, follow. After conducting a review of on-site sewage disposal permits which the township issues, the department found that the township had issued a sewage permit for a lot in a subdivision (Gore subdivision) which had not received sewage facilities planning approval from the department. The township had initially approved the subdivision without obtaining department approval of sewage facilities planning because the lot had been designated as "not for development." In addition, the department discovered that a commercial building had been constructed on another subdivided lot (Dodge subdivision) without a sewage permit or sewage facilities planning approval. Since 1988, the township has approved, without sewage facilities planning approval, approximately twenty-one lots designated as "not for development."

The department, by order dated May 18, 1992, (RR. 4a) directed the township to adopt, within ninety days from the date of that order, regulations and ordinances to prevent the township from issuing building permits and granting final subdivision approvals before the department 1) approves a sewage facilities plan revision for the subdivision, pursuant to section 5 of the Pennsylvania Sewage Facilities Act, Act of January 24, 1966, P.L. 1535, as amended, 35 P.S. § 750.5 or 2) determines that the subdivision proposal qualifies as an exception to the requirement to submit sewage facilities planning to the department for approval.

The township appealed the department's order to the board, contending that 1) the township does not need to submit sewage disposal plans to the department before approving subdivision requests in cases where subdivision occurs but the subdivider has no plans for immediate development of the subdivided property and 2) if the subdivider, at a later date, decides to erect a building on the property, the township would require, at that later stage in the proceedings, sewage facilities planning approval. The township argued that the problem, which had occurred when the Gore subdivision had received a sewage permit without sewage facilities planning approval, was only an isolated incident and had been corrected.

The board found that:

The Supervisors believe that requiring sewage facilities planning approval prior to subdivision approval increases the time and expense of subdividing property, particularly in instances where a farmer may wish to subdivide several lots to obtain ready cash or where a parent may wish to subdivide his property for his children.

Finding of Fact No. 11.

The board found that even if a subdivision is not developed immediately, sewage facilities planning approval is necessary not only to avoid situations like that which occurred with the Gore subdivision, but also because the approval of the subdivision without requiring sewage facilities planning approval until the subdivider seeks a building permit, could affect future sewage disposal needs in the municipality. The board found that problems could later arise if the township approves subdivision requests without obtaining sewage facilities planning approval for the subdivision, in that soil suitability and isolation distances are not addressed until late in the approval process.

Section 105 of the township's subdivision and land development ordinance states:

The Municipalities Planning Code (Act 247) and the Sewage Facilities Act (Act 537) are two separate acts. Approval of plans under either act can be requested first. In addition, plans can be approved under one act, subject to receiving approval under the other act.

Section 502(a) of the ordinance states in part:

A Planning Module for New Land Development shall be submitted where public or private sewage disposal is contemplated consistent with Section 105 of the Ordinance.... If approval of the plan is sought without Planning Module approval, then the plan must state the following or words to that effect:

'Township approval of this subdivision plan does not include approval for development. No township permit will be issued for the erection or placement thereon of any building or structure intended for human occupancy (residential or otherwise), nor shall any improvement related to sewerage be installed thereon, unless and until state approval of a New Land Development Planning Module is received.

(Board's September 10, 1993 Opinion, pgs. 8-9) (Emphasis added.)

The board dismissed the township's appeal of the department's order, concluding that the department has the authority to order the township to revise its ordinance to require sewage facilities planning approval from the department before the township approves subdivision requests where the department found that 1) the township issued an on-site sewage disposal permit without the required sewage facilities planning approval, 2) a building had been erected without the above permit or sewage facilities planning approval, and 3) in the past, the township had approved twenty-one subdivision requests without sewage facilities planning approval, treating these subdivisions as "not for development."

The township filed with this court the present appeal from board's order.

ANALYSIS

This court's scope of review for decisions of the board, is limited to determining whether constitutional rights were violated, errors of law committed, or whether the necessary findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. Willowbrook Mining Co v. Department of Environmental Resources, 92 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 163, 499 A.2d 2 (1985).

1. Sewage Facilities Planning Approval

The township argues that local governments such as the township are the exclusive bodies vested with legislative authority in planning and zoning, and thus the township has the authority to approve subdivision of land in cases where there is no proposed or contemplated generation of sewage, without first obtaining sewage facilities planning approval from the department.

The department argues that, although a municipality has the exclusive power to regulate land development, under the Sewage Facilities Act, the department has authority to order the township to submit sewage facilities plan revisions before approving subdivision requests so that the department may determine whether the plan revisions conform to local planning. The department contends that its authority to monitor sewage planning is not inconsistent with the township's authority to regulate land development.

Section 501 of the Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 805, as amended, 53 P.S. § 10501 gives the governing body ¹ of each municipality authority to regulate subdivisions and land development through a subdivision and land development ordinance. That section requires that all subdivision and land development plats of land be submitted for approval to either the governing body or a planning agency designated in the ordinance for that purpose. In addition, that section requires that the municipality exercise its powers in accordance with the subdivision ordinance.

Section 503 of the MPC, 53 P.S. § 10503, outlines the contents of the subdivision and land development ordinance; that section states in relevant part:

The subdivision and land development ordinance may include, but need not be limited to:

(1) Provisions for the submittal and processing of plats ... and provisions for preliminary and final approval and for processing of final approval by stages or sections of development.

. . . . .

(4) Provisions which take into account phased land development not intended for the immediate erection of buildings where streets, curbs, gutters ... water and sewage facilities and other improvements may not be possible to install as a condition precedent to final approval of plats, but will be a condition precedent to the erection of buildings on land included in the approval plat.

(Emphasis added.)

The township contends that 1) the above section of the MPC allows the township to approve subdivision plans without sewage facilities treatment planning in circumstances where the land is proposed to be subdivided and no building or development is contemplated, i.e., the division of farmland to settle decedents' estates, the separation of existing dwelling units, or the subdivision of land to correct land disputes, and 2) in such cases, sewage...