Carswell v. Town of Morganton
Citation | 236 N.C. 375,72 S.E.2d 748 |
Decision Date | 29 October 1952 |
Docket Number | No. 313,313 |
Parties | CARSWELL, v. TOWN OF MORGANTON. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
Mull, Patton & Craven, Morganton, for plaintiff, appellant.
John H. McMurray, Morganton, for defendant, appellee.
This question arises at the threshold of the appeal: Does the plaintiff's evidence suffice to show that his supposed predecessor, Joel Walker, acting through tenants, acquired title to all the land embraced within the boundaries of the tracts in controversy by twenty years adverse possession under known and visible lines and boundaries within the purview of the statute codified as G.S. § 1-40?
This question must be answered in the negative for the very simple reason that there can be no constructive possession by one holding land adversely unless he holds under color of title.
An adverse possessor of land without color of title can not acquire title to any greater amount of land than that which he has actually occupied for the statutory period. Georgia-Carolina Land & Timber Co. v. Potter, 189 N.C. 56, 127 S.E. 343; Rhodes v. Ange, 173 N.C. 25, 91 S.E. 356; Anderson v. Meadows, 162 N.C. 400, 78 S.E. 279; May v. Manufacturing & Trading Co., 164 N.C. 262, 80 S.E. 380; Berryman v. Kelly, 35 N.C. 269; 2 C.J.S., Adverse Possession, § 181. He cannot enlarge his rights beyond the limits of his actual possession by a claim of title to other land abutting that which he actually occupies, even though such other land may be defined by marked boundaries. Logan v. Fitzgerald, 87 N.C. 308; Bynum v. Thompson, 25 N.C. 578.
The reason for the rule restricting one who holds adversely without color of title to the amount of land actually occupied by him was well stated by that great jurist, Chief Justice Ruffin, more than a century ago. He said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Miller
...S.E. 4, 8. Color of title, without adverse possession thereunder, does not operate to give constructive possession. Carswell v. Town of Morganton, 236 N.C. 375, 72 S.E.2d 748. A party introducing a deed in evidence, which he intends to use as color of title must fit by proof the description......
-
State v. Brooks
...to all persons that he is exercising thereon the dominion of owner.' This is said by Ervin, J., for the Court in Carswell v. Town of Morganton, 236 N.C. 375, 72 S.E.2d 748: 'An adverse possessor of land without color of title can not acquire title to any greater amount of land than that whi......
-
Andrews v. Bruton
...to establish the known and visible lines and boundaries of the land actually occupied for the statutory period. Carswell v. Town of Morganton, 236 N.C. 375, 72 S.E.2d 748. It is well to note that no issue of title was involved in Newkirk v. Porter, 240 N.C. 296, 82 S.E.2d 74. The sole issue......
-
Dockery v. Hocutt
...title to the land in that manner. Wallin v. Rice, 232 N.C. 371, 373, 61 S.E.2d 82, 83 (1950); see also Carswell v. Town of Morganton, 236 N.C. 375, 377-78, 72 S.E.2d 748, 749 (1952). The adverse nature of the possession was defined thusly in Locklear v. It consists in actual possession, wit......