Carter S v. Price S.

• Court: Supreme Court of West Virginia
• Writing for the Court: RITZ, J.
• Citation: 85 W.Va. 744
• Parties: Margaret E. Carter et als v. James A. Price et als.
• Decision Date: 16 March 1920

85 W.Va. 744

Margaret E. Carter et als
v.
James A. Price et als.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Submitted March 9, 1920.
Decided March 16, 1920.

[85 W.Va. 744]

1. Equity Defense of Laches May be Made by Demurrer When Facts Appear on Face of Bill.

The defense of laches may be made by demurrer when the facts upon which such defense is predicated appear from the face of the bill. (p. 749).

[85 W.Va. 745]

2. Same Where Complainant's"Laches" Injuriously affects the Adverse Party, a Court of Equity Will Decline to Give Relief.

Laches in legal significance is delay in the assertion of a claim which works disadvantage to another, and where it appears that by reason of such delay the adverse party would be injuriously affected because of the death of witnesses by whom the truth of the situation could be proven, or because injury might result to him on account of expenditures made upon the land in the way of improvements, or where no claim is asserted until after the land has grown in value, either because of the development of the territory or the discovery of valuable minerals thereon, and such delay in asserting such claim is so long as to lead to the belief that it is asserted largely because of the increased value of the land and the altered conditions, a court of equity will decline to give relief, (p. 749).

3. Same Delay in Assertion of Known Rights to Prejudice of Adverse Party is an Estoppel Against Assertion of Sucfo Rights.

Where a party knows his rights or is cognizant of his interest in a particular subject-matter, but takes no steps to enforce the same until the condition of the other party has, in good faith, become so changed, that he cannot be restored to his former state if the right be then enforced, delay becomes inequitable, and operates as an estoppel against the assertion of the right. This disadvantage may come from death of parties, loss of evidence, change of title or condition of the subject-matter, intervention of equities, or other causes. When a court of equity sees negligence on one side and injury therefrom on the other, it is a ground for denial of relief, (p. 749).

Appeal from Circuit Court, Kanawha County.

Suit by Margaret E. Carter and others against James A. Price and others. Demurrer to bill sustained and bill dismissed, and plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

A. M. Belcher, for appellants.

Brown, Jackson & Knight and M. F. Matheny, for appellees. Ritz, Judge:

This suit is brought by a daughter and the heirs-at-law of two other daughters of Edmund Price, Sr., against a son of said Edmund Price, Sr., and the descendants of his remaining

[85 W.Va. 746]

children, and their grantees, for the purpose of having partition of certain real estate of which it is contended said Edmund Price, Sr., died seized; to have an accounting of the rents, issues and profits derived therefrom, as well as an accounting for waste alleged to have been committed thereon; and to have set aside a deed from said Edmund Price, Sr., to his sons Archibald Price, Edmund Price, Burdette Price and James Price, dated the 12th day of February, 1848, and recorded in the office of the clerk of the county court of Kanawha county on said 12th of February, 1848, upon the ground that said deed is a forgery.

The bill shows that Edmund Price, Sr., departed this life intestate, leaving surviving him eleven children, one of whom, Harriett Young and the heirs of two others, are the plaintiffs and one of whom, to_wit, James A. Price, and the heirs-at-law of the others, who are deceased, are the defendants, together with sundry of their grantees. It is alleged that at the time of the death of Edmund Price, Sr., he was seized and possessed of a tract of 859 acres of land lying in the county of Kanawha, which was the remainder of a larger tract of more than 1200 acres theretofore conveyed to him, he having in his lifetime conveyed away certain parcels of this 1200-acre tract. It is alleged further that there appears of...