Carter v. Bryant

Decision Date12 November 1930
Docket Number407.
PartiesCARTER et ux. v. BRYANT.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Davidson County; McElroy, Judge.

Action by G. E. Carter and wife for specific performance of written contract to purchase land, lumber plant, etc., to recover damages for alleged breach of said contract, and to recover value of certain lumber sold and delivered to the defendant. Defendant denied liability and set up counterclaim for alleged breach of contract on the part of plaintiffs. From a judgment of nonsuit on the first and second causes of action and order continuing the third cause and defendant's counterclaim for future determination, plaintiffs appeal.

Affirmed.

Brittain & Brittain, of Asheboro, and Phillips & Bower, of Lexington for appellants.

Bryan & Campbell, of Wilmington, and H. R. Kyser, of Thomasville, for appellee.

STACY C.J.

From the judgment and order entered at the February term, 1930 Davidson superior court, the plaintiffs gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, and were allowed forty-five days to make out and serve statement of case on appeal, with thirty days thereafter given to the defendant to prepare and file exceptions or counter case.

The plaintiffs' statement of case, consisting of 29 typewritten pages, throughout which appear at least 45 notations, "Clerk will here copy deed," or ""Clerk will here copy plaintiffs' exhibit No. --," etc., was served on defendant's counsel April 2, 1930. No deeds or exhibits, which the clerk was directed to copy and insert therein, accompanied this statement. Deeming said statement, as made out and served, insufficient to show error on the part of the trial court, counsel for defendant notified the clerk of the superior court of Davidson county, May 22, 1930, that no exceptions or counter case would be filed, and that the plaintiffs' statement of case on appeal, exactly as made out and served, without alteration, amendment, or insertion of deeds and exhibits, would therefore become the statement of case on appeal by operation of law. State v. Price, 110 N.C. 599, 15 S.E. 116.

Thereafter, the deeds and exhibits referred to in plaintiffs' statement of case on appeal, as made out and served, were copied by some one and presented to the clerk for incorporation into said statement. The clerk did not insert these deeds and exhibits in the statement of case on appeal, but certifies that the "first 47 sheets contain the case on appeal *** and the succeeding 73 sheets contain true and correct copies of the exhibits referred to by notations in said case on appeal."

On October...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Pruitt v. Wood
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 3, 1930
    ... ... Ellis, 199 ... N.C. 708, 155 S.E. 924 (dismissed for failure to file brief ... and to send up necessary parts of record proper); Carter ... v. Bryant, 199 N.C. 704, 155 S.E. 602 (affirmed for ... failure to serve proper statement of case on appeal); ... Rasberry v. Hicks, 199 N.C ... ...
  • State v. Bittings
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • June 20, 1934
    ... ... in the Supreme Court, 200 N.C. 824-827-831. See, also, ... State v. Lea, 203 N.C. 13, 164 S.E. 737; Carter ... v. Bryant, 199 N.C. 704, 155 S.E. 602, and Riggan v ... Harrison, 203 N.C. 191, 165 S.E. 358 ...          But, ... treating the ... ...
  • Springs v. Atlantic Refining Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 22, 1933
    ...present state of the record, which seems somewhat meager and might have been prepared more in conformity to the rules ( Carter v. Bryant, 199 N.C. 704, 155 S.E. 602), think the court erred in doing more than continuing the injunction to the hearing. Where the main purpose of an action is to......
  • Abernethy v. Burns
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 4, 1936
    ... ... C.S.Supp.1924, § 643; State v. Ray, 206 N.C. 736, ... 175 S.E. 109; State v. Humphrey, 186 N.C. 533, 120 ... S.E. 85; Carter v. Bryant, 199 N.C. 704, 155 S.E ... 602; Barber v. Justice, 138 N.C. 20, 50 S.E. 445. It ... is far from "a concise statement of the case," and ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT