Carter v. Carter, 74--767

Decision Date18 March 1975
Docket NumberNo. 74--767,74--767
PartiesDoyle Edgar CARTER, Individually and as Co-Executor of the Estate of Thomas E. Carter, and Southeast First National Bank of Miami, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Thomas E. Carter, Appellants, v. Sonja CARTER, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Steel, Hector & Davis and Joseph P. Klock, Jr., Miami, for appellants.

Robert M. Brake, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendants in the trial court from a final judgment in favor of the plaintiff entered by the court after trial without jury.

Sonja Carter, appellee herein, filed a complaint for declaratory decree alleging that she was the widow of Thomas E. Carter, deceased, seeking a declaration of her homestead interests in his property upon his death. The appellants, Southeast First National Bank of Miami and Doyle Edgar Carter, as co-executors of the estate of Thomas E. Carter, denied that the appellee was the widow of their testator. The matter was tried by the court without jury, and the court entered its final judgment stating, inter alia, that Sonja Carter, the appellee, and Thomas E. Carter had entered into a common law marriage which continued until his death, thus making the appellee his wiodw, entitled to all of the rights and privileges of such status. In its final judgment the court made findings of fact and adjudicated as follows:

'1. SONJA CARTER and THOMAS E. CARTER entered into a ceremonial marriage in Dade County, Florida on January 11, 1963, and lived together as husband and wife at 704 Zamora Avenue, Coral Gables, Florida until they separated and a divorce decree was entered by the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, Case No. 64C--1792 on July 6, 1964.

2. SONJA CARTER returned to Germany to live with her mother. During December, 1964, THOMAS E. CARTER went to Germany to see SONJA CARTER. They traveled togehter in Germany and Switzerland and each returned separetely to the United States and began living together at 704 Zmora Avenue, Coral Gables, Florida.

3. Florida Statutes, Section 741.211 did not invalidate common law marriages entered into prior to January 1, 1968. However, since THOMAS E. CARTER is dead, and SONJA CARTER is prohibited from testifying about transaction with him by Florida Statutes, Section 90.05 ('The Dead Man's Statute'), the Court was required to use circumstantial evidence to determine the agreement between the parties. LeBlanc v. Yahn (Yawn) 99 Fla. 328, 126 So. 789; Edge v. Rynerson, (Rynearson) 107 Fla. 461, 145 So. 180; McBride v. McBride, (Fla.App.) 137 (130) So.2d 302; (130) In re Estate of Alcala, (Fla.App.) 188 So.2d 902 (903). The evidence showed that THOMAS E. CARTER told the mother of SONJA CARTER in Germany in 1964 that he and SONJA CARTER were renewing their marriage relationship. Beginning in January, 1965 SONJA CARTER and THOMAS E. CARTER lived in the house at 704 Zamora Avenue, Coral Gables. Although the relationship was stormy and not without interruption, and although they did not socialize with their neighbors, the neighbors were aware that they were living together. They attended, as husband and wife, many social events given by the Lions Club of Coral Cables, or by members of the Lions Club; and THOMAS E. CARTER continued to list SONJA CARTER as his wife in the Lions Club Roster and introduced her to visitors to the home and to the Lions Club and to new Lions as his wife. They traveled together to Europe in 1965 and in 1967 on tickets purchased by THOMAS E. CARTER in the names of 'Mr. and Mrs. THOMAS E. CARTER'; and THOMAS E. CARTER paid for dental work for SONJA CARTER in 1965 and discussed the work to be done and the arrangements for payment therefore with the dentist. While this evidence may have lacked positive statements as to words of agreement exchanged between the parties, it revealed that they reconciled and resumed cohabitation and were publicly recognized as husband and wife prior to the effective date of Florida Statutes, Section 742.211 (In re Beacher's Estate (Fla.App.) 177 So.2d at 838; Navarro Inc. v. Baker (Fla.) 54 So.2d 59).

4. Aginst (sic) this strong prima facie proof of a common law marriage the evidence offered by the Executors of the Estate was insufficient to rebut the strong presumption of validity of this marriage (McBride v. McBride, (Fla.App.) (130) 137 So.2d 302). Although SONJA CARTER filed a separate income tax return beginning with the year 1966 in which the marital status box marked 'single' was checked, there was no showing that this use was accompanied by any express denial of the common law marriage. Nor did the existence of the 1964 divorce decree operate to prevent, or even hinder, a common law marriage. As pointed out by the Third District Court of Appeal in the case of Beacher's Estate, 177 So.2d 838 at 843, after the divorce, each of the parties became free to remarry and the policy of the law is to 'lend assistance and protection to such married couples in extending or renewing a lawful union.' Similarly, a Property Settlement Agreement entered into before the 1964 divorce was rendered void by the remarriage. Weeks v. Weeks, (143 Fla. 686) 197 So. 393, Hullet v. Hullet, 3 Pac.2d 470, 133 Kan, 738. It is, therefore,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED AS FOLLOWS:

1. (a) The court hereby finds...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Cox v. Cox
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • August 24, 1995
    ...of a prior property settlement agreement was rendered invalid by the reconciliation of the parties to that agreement); Carter v. Carter, 309 So.2d 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975) (recognizing that a prior property settlement agreement was rendered void by the remarriage of the parties to each other)......
  • Thomas v. Thomas
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 16, 1990
    ...has held that Weeks applies when the parties remarry each other, Weston v. Weston, 483 So.2d 822 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Carter v. Carter, 309 So.2d 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), and that the Weeks rule is applicable when the property settlement agreement has been incorporated into the final judgment......
  • Delgado v. Cotta de Lopez, 88-2018
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 6, 1989
    ...has held that Weeks applies when the parties remarry each other, Weston v. Weston, 483 So.2d 822 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Carter v. Carter, 309 So.2d 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), and that the Weeks rule is applicable when the property settlement agreement has been incorporated into the final judgment......
  • Martin v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 88-3403
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • May 15, 1989
    ...marriage upon a showing of general reputation and continuous cohabitation. In re Estate of Rees, 480 A.2d at 328; Carter v. Carter, 309 So.2d 625, 628 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1975). ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT