Carter v. Metropolitan Dade County, 70--998

Decision Date28 September 1971
Docket NumberNo. 70--998,70--998
Citation253 So.2d 920
PartiesJanae Marie CARTER, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Debra K. Visser, deceased minor, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY et al., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Sinclair & Louis and Paul Siegel, Miami, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Blackwell, Walker & Gray and James E. Tribble, Miami, Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant Carter seeks review of a final judgment in favor of multiple defendants, who are appellees herein, which judgment was entered pursuant to a jury verdict. She brought a consolidated wrongful death and survival action for the death of her 14-year-old daughter, Debra. She alleged that wrongful acts were committed by: Jackson Memorial Hospital; Dr. Ruiz (then a resident) and Dr. Mills, who were doctors at Jackson Memorial's Psychiatric Institute; Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of the phenothiazine drug 'Mellaril' with which the decedent was treated, allegedly causing her death. We express the view that no reversible error has been demonstrated, and affirm the judgment.

Debra was committed to Jackson Memorial by juvenile authorities because of a suicide attempt by her. She responded favorably to 100 mg. per day doses of the drug 'Mellaril'. Dr. Ruiz, then a resident, was authorized by Dr. Mills to increase to 2400 mg. per day doses, allegedly 3 to 4 times the manufacturer's recommended dosages. On August 8, 1966, the date of Debra's death, the dosage was 2,000 mg. per day, purportedly contrary to the manufacturer's recommendations to decrease a dosage to the smallest effective dose. Apparently Dr. Mills knew of the 'sudden death phenomenon' associated with the drug; see, e.g., L. E. Hollister and J. C. Kosek, 'Sudden Death During Treatment with Phenothiazine Derivatives,' 192 Journal of the American Medical Association 1035 (June, 1965).

The appellant seeks reversal on the grounds that the court erred: (1) in denying a curative instruction or motion for mistrial for improper closing argument by defense counsel; (2) in refusing to direct a verdict against the drug manufacturer at the close of all the evidence and to give a charge as to a manufacturer's liability upon theories of implied warranty of merchantability and of negligence per se for violation of Florida's penal statutes concerning misbranded drugs; (3) in refusing to instruct as to 'informed consent', where the deceased, without the consent of the parent or the court, was administered excessive doses of a dangerous drug; (4) excluding part of the incident report of Dr. Ruiz and the summary of the 'grand Round' 1 presentation containing admissions against interest; (5) in giving repetitious charges on the standard of care; (6) in excluding testimony that appellant learned of her daughter's death when an employee of Jackson...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 21, 1979
    ...the manufacturer has been held absolved from liability as a matter of law (Magee v. Wyeth Laboratories, Supra; Carter v. Metropolitan Dade County, (Fla.App.) 253 So.2d 920, cert. den. (Fla.) 263 So.2d 584; Nolan v. Dillon, 261 Md. 516, 276 A.2d 36). Recently the Second Department considered......
  • Dade County Medical Ass'n v. Hlis
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 22, 1979
    ...285 (N.D.Ga.1971). Very significantly, this court has cited with approval and followed the Bredice case in Carter v. Metropolitan Dade County, 253 So.2d 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). We again endorse the views expressed in that In opposition to these significant considerations which would preclud......
  • Oviatt v. Archbishop Bergan Mercy Hospital
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • January 31, 1974
    ...but are in the nature of a retrospective review of the effectiveness of certain medical procedures.' See, also, Carter v. Metropolitan Dade County (Fla.App.), 253 So.2d 920; Gillman v. United States, 53 F.R.D. 316, U.S.Dist.Ct., We conclude the proceedings and records of the medical staff c......
  • Carter v. Metropolitan Dade County, 41894
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • May 22, 1972
    ...COUNTY, etc., et al., Respondents. No. 41894. Supreme Court of Florida. May 22, 1972. Rehearing Denied July 10, 1972. Certiorari denied. 253 So.2d 920. ROBERTS, C.J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT