Carter v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., OWENS-ILLINOI
| Decision Date | 31 May 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 77-8,OWENS-ILLINOI,INC,No. 2,77-8,2 |
| Citation | 261 Ark. 728,551 S.W.2d 209 |
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
| Parties | Joe H. CARTER, Appellant, v., Appellee |
Robert S. Blatt, Fort Smith, for appellant.
Bethell, Callaway & Robertson, Fort Smith, for appellee.
The only issue in this case is, can a federal district court and a state circuit court have jurisdiction at the same time of the same subject matter involving identical parties? The trial court ruled that they could and we agree.
The appellant, Joe H. Carter, sued the appellee, Owens-Illinois, Inc., in the Federal District Court at Fort Smith over a vehicle accident that occurred in Fort Smith. Owens filed an answer to the lawsuit and later a counter-claim for property damages. After the lawsuit was filed in federal court, Owens filed a lawsuit in Sebastian Circuit Court against Joe Carter over the same accident. Therefore, we have identical claims involving the same parties concerning the same subject matter pending in two courts at the same time.
Carter asked the federal court to enjoin the state court from hearing the lawsuit. The federal court denied the request. See Carter v. Bedford (Owens-Illinois, Inc.), D.C., 420 F.Supp. 927 (1976). Apparently the case is still pending in federal court.
Carter next filed a motion for summary judgment in the state court asking the case to be dismissed because the federal case was filed first, involved the same matter, between the same parties. The trial court denied the motion, the case was tried before a jury, judgment was entered for Owens and denied Carter. Carter raises only the one issue of jurisdiction on appeal.
Federal district courts and state courts are separate jurisdictions. Identical cases between the same parties can be pending in each court at the same time. See Baker et al. v. Harrison, Judge, 247 Ark. 377, 445 S.W.2d 498 (1969). It is the same situation as if identical cases between the same parties were pending in different states. In such a situation the first forum to dispose of the case by trial enters a judgment that is binding on the parties.
Arkansas law does prohibit identical cases between the same parties from proceeding in different Arkansas counties. However, this is a matter of venue and not jurisdiction. See Ark.Stats.Ann. § 27-1115 (Repl.1962).
Affirmed:
We agree: HARRIS, C. J., and FOGLEMAN and BYRD, JJ.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Health v. Murphy
...See, e.g., Nat'l Bank of Commerce v. Dow Chem. Co., 338 Ark. 752, 759, 1 S.W.3d 443, 447 (1999); see also Carter v. Owens–Illinois, Inc., 261 Ark. 728, 551 S.W.2d 209 (1977). In such a situation, this court has held that the first forum to dispose of the case enters a judgment that is bindi......
-
Coleman's Service Center, Inc. v. F.D.I.C.
...suit were necessarily within the issues of the former suit and might have been litigated therein. In Carter v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 261 Ark. 728, 729, 551 S.W.2d 209 (1977), the supreme court stated that identical cases between the same parties can be pending in a federal district court an......
-
Nat'l Bank of Commerce et al v. Dow Chemical et al
...cases between the same parties may be pending in a federal court and a state court at the same time. See Carter v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 261 Ark. 728, 551 S.W.2d 209 (1977). However, the "first forum to dispose of the case" enters "a judgment that is binding on the parties." Id. at 730, 551......
-
White v. Toney, CA
...court's jurisdiction, since identical cases in different states can be pending in each court at the same time. Carter v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 261 Ark. 728, 551 S.W.2d 209 (1977). In such a situation, the parties are bound by the judgment of the forum which first disposes of the case by tri......