Carter v. Pruitt

Decision Date16 September 1975
Docket NumberNo. 30155,30155
Citation219 S.E.2d 114,235 Ga. 204
PartiesThomas R. CARTER v. James R. PRUITT et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Thomas R. Carter, pro se.

Jane Kent Plaginos, Cumming, for appellees.

HALL, Justice.

Thomas H. Carter, pro se, brings before the court in this equity matter certain allegations which could have been presented on appeal from an order of the Blue Ridge Superior Court dated October 9, 1972, had such an appeal been pursued when timely. No such appeal was taken, and the October 9, 1972, order is res judicata as to most of the points sought to be belatedly raised herein. Blakely v. Blakely, 232 Ga. 60, 61, 205 S.E.2d 205; Mitchell v. Hayden, Stone, Inc., 225 Ga. 711, 713, 171 S.E.2d 280; Code § 6-701(a)(3). Other points, never having been raised in the trial court, or raised there and properly dismissed for failure to prosecute (see Schwall v. McNeil,232 Ga. 679, 208 S.E.2d 487), will not be considered for the first time here. There is no merit to Carter's claim that for procedural reasons plaintiffs were not entitled to the grant of their motion to dismiss on the basis of res judicata; they were otherwise entitled to have his claims entirely dismissed for failure to prosecute.

The March 28, 1975 judgment of the Blue Ridge Superior Court dismissing Carter's claims in their entirety, will be affirmed.

Appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Pfeiffer v. Georgia Dept. of Transp.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 26 Noviembre 2002
    ...Co. v. Bundrage, 264 Ga. 632, 633, 452 S.E.2d 474 (1994); Hammond v. Paul, 249 Ga. 241, 242, 290 S.E.2d 54(1982); Carter v. Pruitt, 235 Ga. 204, 204, 219 S.E.2d 114 (1975); Duncan v. Duncan, 226 Ga. 605(2), 176 S.E.2d 88 (1970); Velkey v. Grimes, 214 Ga. 420, 421, 105 S.E.2d 224 (1958). 8. ......
  • Sawyer v. Citizens and Southern Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 13 Octubre 1982
    ... ... Paul's "reasonable time" argument was not raised below and it will not be considered for the first time on appeal. Carter v. Pruitt, 235 Ga. 204, 219 ... S.E.2d 114 (1975). Deal v. Dickson, 231 Ga. 366, 202 S.E.2d 41 (1973); Williams v. First Bank & Trust Co., 154 ... ...
  • Graham Bros.' Const. Co., Inc. v. C. W. Matthews Contracting Co., Inc., 62062
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 14 Septiembre 1981
    ...by the defendant, and it cannot now insist that the principles of its request to charge were applicable to the case. See Carter v. Pruitt, 235 Ga. 204, 219 S.E.2d 114. The defendant having adopted the previous withdrawal of its written request did not thereafter object to the omission of th......
  • Cohran v. Carlin
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 19 Junio 1985
    ...241(1), 290 S.E.2d 54 (1982); Sawyer v. Citizens and Southern Nat. Bank, 164 Ga.App. 177, 183, 296 S.E.2d 134 (1982); Carter v. Pruitt, 235 Ga. 204, 219 S.E.2d 114 (1975). Furthermore, this ground must be deemed abandoned pursuant to our Rule 45, as Cohran provides no argument in support of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT