Carter v. State
Decision Date | 05 January 1943 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 433. |
Citation | 243 Ala. 575,11 So.2d 764 |
Parties | CARTER v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
We are not of opinion that the statute, Code 1940, T. 14, § 59, on its face deals with the freedom of speech or the press, or in any way interferes therewith. Therefore the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S 88, 60 S.Ct. 736, 84 L.Ed. 1093, is not an apt authority.
We are of opinion, however, that the first subdivision of said statute on which the prosecution is rested is void for uncertainty in the expression of the legislative intent. Standard Oil Co. v. State, 178 Ala. 400, 59 So. 667; 59 C.J. p. 601, § 160.
Said Section 59 provides, inter alia, "Any person, firm corporation or association of persons who, without a just cause or legal excuse, wilfully or wantonly does any act with the intent or with reason to believe that such act will injure, interfere with, hinder, delay, or obstruct any lawful business or enterprise, in which persons are employed for wages; * * * shall be guilty of a misdemeanor."
The misdemeanor is left to stand not upon the result or effect of the act but upon "the intent or with reason to believe that such act will injure, interfere with, hinder, delay, or obstruct," a lawful business or enterprise. Otherwise stated, the mental attitude of the actor, which may have no effect at all, is the sine qua non of the misdemeanor.
* * *." 59 Corpus Juris, p. 601, § 160; Standard Oil Co. v. State, supra; United States v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 8 Cir., 213 F. 169, 130 C.C.A. 5.
This statute goes deeper than to punish one for what he may express in words. It seeks to punish one for what he thinks or believes, regardless of the potency or impotency of the act prompted by thought or belief, to accomplish the result intended or believed to follow such act. This is a legislative abuse of the police power of the state. 6 R.C.L. p. 188, § 187, p. 198, § 194; Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623, 8 S.Ct. 273, 31 L.Ed. 205; Eidge v. City of Bessemer, 164 Ala. 599, 605, 51 So. 246, 26 L.R.A., N.S., 394.
We express no opinion as to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
...on the basis of a censor's conclusion that it is 'sacrilegious." Nor is this principal a stranger to our jurisprudence. Carter v. State, 243 Ala. 575, 11 So.2d 764; Kahalley v. State, 254 Ala. 482, 48 So.2d Mr. Justice Simpson well stated the rule in Bolin v. State, 266 Ala. 256, 96 So.2d 5......
-
Lash v. State
... ... Louis ... Ry. Co. v. Beckwith, 129 U.S. 26, 29, 9 S.Ct. 207, 32 L.Ed ... 585; Giozza v. Tiernan, 148 U.S. 657, 13 S.Ct. 721, ... 37 L.Ed. 599; Jones v. Brim, 165 U.S. 180, 182, 17 ... S.Ct. 282, 41 L.Ed. 677 ... In the ... recent case by this court of Carter et al. v. Knapp Motor ... Co. Inc., 11 So.2d 383, 384, 385, 386, it is observed of ... the administration by our courts as follows: ... "Our ... decisions are to the effect that the right to conduct ... one's business without the wrongful interference of ... others is a valuable ... ...
-
Lash v. State
... ... Louis ... Ry. Co. v. Beckwith, 129 U.S. 26, 29, 9 S.Ct. 207, 32 L.Ed ... 585; Giozza v. Tiernan, 148 U.S. 657, 13 S.Ct. 721, ... 37 L.Ed. 599; Jones v. Brim, 165 U.S. 180, 182, 17 ... S.Ct. 282, 41 L.Ed. 677 ... In the ... recent case by this court of Carter et al. v. Knapp Motor ... Co., Inc., 11 So.2d 383, 384, 385, 386, it is observed ... of the administration by our courts as follows: ... "Our ... decisions are to the effect that the right to conduct ... one's business without the wrongful interference of ... others is a valuable ... ...
- Daniels v. State