Cash v. State, No. 51126
| Decision Date | 15 October 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 3,No. 51126 |
| Citation | 221 S.E.2d 63,136 Ga.App. 149 |
| Parties | Eva E. CASH v. The STATE |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
J. Dunham McAllister, Jonesboro, for appellant.
William H. Ison, Dist. Atty., Clarence L. Leathers, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Jonesboro, for appellee.
This is a drug case. Defendant was arrested and charged with the offense of theft by taking. A store security officer had followed defendant from a department store to the parking lot, detained her and returned her to the security office in the store to await the arrival of a police officer who carried her to jail.
Inventory was taken of her personal property at the jail, at which time she was found to possess illegal drugs, and charged accordingly.
Motion to suppress the drugs because of an illegal arrest was filed, heard and denied.
Defendant appeals. Held:
1. In a hearing on a motion to suppress the burden of proving that the search and seizure were lawful shall be on the State. Code Ann. § 27-313.
2. A private person may arrest an offender, if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge; and detain him, if it is a felony, upon reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion. Code §§ 27-201, 27-211; Long v. State, 12 Ga. 293(4); Moore v. State, 128 Ga.App. 20, 195 S.E.2d 275. And the owner or operator of a mercantile establishment, or any agent or employee thereof, has broad powers under Code Ann. § 105-1005 to detain persons reasonably thought to be engaged in shoplifting. Dixon v. S. S. Kresge, Inc., 119 Ga.App. 776(1), 169 S.E.2d 189.
3. The security officer upon whose affidavit the accusation for theft by taking was made, testified that she saw the defendant take a $4.37 stereo tape, property of the department store, from the store without paying for it. This evidence was sufficient for the security officer to make an arrest; and the subsequent finding of the drugs during an inventory of her personal property at the jail was not an illegal search and seizure, since the arrest was lawful.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Manders v. Lee, 01-13606.
...Ga.Code Ann. § 36-8-5 (authorizing arrest by county police); id. § 17-4-60 (authorizing arrest by private parties); Cash v. State, 136 Ga.App. 149, 221 S.E.2d 63, 64 (1975) (approving store security officer's arrest of shoplifter). Yet it is settled law that city police, county police, and ......
-
Williams v. State
...the facts and circumstances surrounding her detention resulted in the lawful discovery that she was a drug trafficker. Cash v. State, 136 Ga.App. 149(3), 221 S.E.2d 63; Walker v. State, 144 Ga.App. 838(2), 839, 242 S.E.2d 753, supra. 2. The issues raised as to the punishment imposed for "tr......
-
Russell v. State, 62143
... ... 292] violation of any of the constitutional rights of this defendant. See Cash v. State, 136 Ga.App. 149(2), 221 S.E.2d 63. Compare Watts v. Cannon, 224 Ga. 797, 798, 164 S.E.2d 780. The defendant and his witnesses all ... ...
-
Kingsbury v. Exxon Co., U.S. A., 50929
... ... (1) A failure to state a claim ... (2) Plaintiff was merely an employee under written contract which ... ...