Casillas v. State
Decision Date | 11 December 1997 |
Docket Number | No. A98A0245,A98A0245 |
Citation | 494 S.E.2d 760,229 Ga.App. 805 |
Parties | , 98 FCDR 179 CASILLAS v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Gregory N. Crawford, Savannah, for appellant.
Spencer Lawton, Jr., District Attorney, Ronald M. Adams, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
Joe M. Casillas appeals from the order of the superior court denying his motion for appeal bond/supersedeas bond. For prior appellate history of this case, see generally Casillas v. State, 267 Ga. 541, 480 S.E.2d 571.
Appellant was indicted for murder, felony murder, involuntary manslaughter and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime; he was convicted of felony involuntary manslaughter by causing death by an unlawful act, to wit: the misdemeanor offense of reckless conduct or pointing pistol at another (OCGA § 16-5-3(a)), and of the felony offense of possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime (OCGA § 16-11-106(b)). He was sentenced to ten years with five to serve on the involuntary manslaughter conviction (five years probated) and an additional five years probation to be served consecutively on the firearm possession conviction.
Appellant moved for a new trial and for an appeal bond. An unreported hearing was held on May 2, 1997, at the conclusion of which appellant's motion for appeal bond was denied; however, the written order denying bond was not issued until July 24, 1997. Held:
Jarrett v. State, 222 Ga.App. 521, 522, 474 S.E.2d 702. Birge, supra, requires the trial court to address four questions when determining whether to allow an appeal bond: (a) Is there a substantial risk the applicant will flee? (b) Is there a substantial risk the applicant will pose a danger to others or to the community? (c) Is there a substantial risk the applicant will intimidate witnesses or otherwise interfere with the administration of justice? And (d) does it appear the appeal was frivolous or was taken only for purposes of delay? An affirmative answer to any of these questions will support the trial court's denial of an appeal bond. Moore v. State, 151 Ga.App. 413, 414, n. 1, 260 S.E.2d 350. In making this fresh determination, the trial court should take into account the nature of the crime and length of sentence imposed as well as the factors relevant to pretrial release. Birge, supra at 90, 230 S.E.2d 895.
In the absence of a transcript of an appeal bond motion hearing, the ruling of the trial court denying bond must be presumed to be correct. Moore, supra at 415, 260 S.E.2d 350. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fennell v. State, A04A1859.
... ... However, there is no transcript of the hearing on this motion. "In the absence of a transcript of an appeal bond motion hearing, the ruling of the trial court denying bond must be presumed to be correct." (Citation omitted.) Casillas v. State, 229 Ga.App. 805, ... 806, 494 S.E.2d 760 (1997). As there is no transcript in this case, we presume the trial court ruled correctly and find no merit in this enumeration of error ... 4. Fennell contends the trial court erred by denying his request for a charge on ... ...
- Moncus v. State
-
Tubbs v. State
...OCGA § 24-5-26. Finally, "[i]t is the primary responsibility of the appellant to perfect the record on appeal." Casillas v. State, 229 Ga.App. 805, 806, 494 S.E.2d 760 (1997). The trial exhibits were not transmitted with the record to this 3. While the State asserts that the fingerprint car......
-
Abernathy v. State, A00A1280.
...500 (1997). 3. Knapp v. State, 223 Ga.App. 267, 268-269, 477 S.E.2d 621 (1996). 4. Id. at 269, 477 S.E.2d 621; Casillas v. State, 229 Ga.App. 805, 806, 494 S.E.2d 760 (1997). 5. Ayala v. State, 262 Ga. 704, 707(2), 425 S.E.2d 282 (1993); Wade, supra. 6. Casillas, supra. 7. See Shaw v. State......