Castellano, In re
| Decision Date | 12 November 1974 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Nicholas L. CASTELLANO, an attorney. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Before HOPKINS, Acting P.J., and MARTUSCELLO, LATHAM, SHAPIRO and CHRIST, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
On September 3, 1974, the respondent was convicted, on his plea of guilty, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, of 15 specifications of contempt pursuant to section 401 of title 18 of the United States Code and subdivision (b) of rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and fined $500. Thereafter, the judges of the District Court referred the matter to this court for any action it deemed appropriate in the premises.
On October 9, 1974, the respondent was interviewed by two justices of this court. At that interview he requested that the institution of formal proceedings against him be dispensed with and that this court make any disposition of the complaint against him which is deemed appropriate on the basis of the record in the District Court. That request was confirmed by his letter to this court dated October 10, 1974. The request is granted.
The contempt citation arose out of the respondent's representation of several defendants during the trial on the indictment in United States v. Peter Vario et al., which took place in the spring of 1974. The specifications charge generally that on numerous occasions during the trial the respondent made insulting and disrespectful remarks to the court and interjected improper and sarcastic comments during the proceedings. The following examples will suffice to illustrate his behavior:
During the direct examination of a witness by the prosecutor, the respondent asked the court, within the hearing of the jury, 'Are you permitting the nonsense that is going on in this courtroom?'
The respondent interrupted the prosecutor's examination of a witness to declare that the proceedings were a 'farce'.
During his cross-examination of a witness, the respondent gratuitously informed the jury of an item of information relative to the trial which had appeared in a newspaper.
During the cross-examination of a prosecution witness with a criminal record, the respondent characterized the witness as 'the scum of the earth', said that the prosecutor was 'as bad as he is' and concluded his examination by saying, 'I think I have to throw up'.
During the cross-examination by an attorney for a codefendant of an expert witness...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Cutler
...practicing law. See Matter of Perkins, 69 A.D.2d 160, 419 N.Y.S.2d 1 (1st Dep't 1979) (per curiam); Matter of Castellano, 46 A.D.2d 792, 361 N.Y.S.2d 23 (2d Dep't 1974) (memorandum). CONCLUSION We have considered all of Cutler's arguments, and find them without merit. We recognize that Cutl......
-
Rappaport, In re
...489, 363 N.Y.S.2d 324 (1st Dept. 1975); In re Ruggiero, 40 A.D.2d 135, 338 N.Y.S.2d 749 (1st Dept. 1972). See In re Castellano, 46 A.D.2d 792, 361 N.Y.S.2d 23 (2d Dept. 1974) (censure after federal conviction of contempt for disrespect in court). The same sort of overreaching on a contingen......
-
Dwyer v. Nicholson
...in the fairness of judicial rulings and judgments and perverts the trial procedure as a serious search for the truth" (Matter of Castellano, 46 A.D.2d 792, 361 N.Y.S.2d 23 [a public censure warranted for unprofessional remarks by counsel during We have examined the parties' remaining conten......
-
Betancourt v. Trump Empire State Partners, 2007 NY Slip Op 31677(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 6/1/2007)
...rulings and judgments and perverts the trial procedures as a serious search for the truth" (193 A.D.2d at 77, quoting Matter of Castellano, 46 A.D.2d 792 [1974]). Although attorneys, during summation, are permitted the widest latitude in discussing the evidence and presenting their theories......