Castle v. United States
| Decision Date | 16 October 1961 |
| Docket Number | M,No. 60,60 |
| Citation | 82 S.Ct. 123,7 L.Ed.2d 75,368 U.S. 13 |
| Parties | Glenn Dale CASTLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. isc |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Glenn Dale Castle, pro se.
Solicitor General Cox, for the United States.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. We are in agreement with the representations of the Solicitor General that, under the principles announced in Bell v. United States, 349 U.S. 81, 75 S.Ct. 620, 99 L.Ed. 905, the petitioner was guilty of but a single offense under 18 U.S.C. § 2314, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2314. In light of such representations and upon consideration of the entire record, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions to remit to the District Court for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Podesto, In re
... ... 1, § 6) of the California Constitution, which states in relevant part that 'A person shall be released on bail by sufficient sureties, except for ... scrutiny' standard is the appropriate constitutional guideline in this matter (see, e.g., United States v. Thompson (1971) 147 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 452 F.2d 1333, 1340), we nonetheless conclude that ... ...
-
Castle v. United States
...Our judgment was vacated and the case remanded to the district court "for resentencing in accordance with this opinion." 368 U.S. 13, 82 S.Ct. 123, 7 L.Ed.2d 75. On remand, appellant was resentenced to ten years' imprisonment and fined $10,000.1 He again appealed to this Court but we affirm......
-
People v. Hartfield
...N.E.2d 200 (1978) (citing Bell v. United States , 349 U.S. 81, 75 S.Ct. 620, 99 L.Ed. 905 (1955) ); Castle v. United States , 368 U.S. 13, 82 S.Ct. 123, 7 L.Ed.2d 75 (1961) (per curiam ); and Carter , 213 Ill. 2d at 302-03, 290 Ill.Dec. 182, 821 N.E.2d 233 (citing United States v. Universal......
-
State v. Knott
... ... There is no requirement that police stop a person who enters a police station and states that he wishes to confess to a crime, or a person who calls the police to offer a confession or any ... United States v. DeBose, 410 F.2d 1273 (6th Cir. 1969); Bazzell v. State, 6 Md.App. 194, 250 A.2d 674 ... 305, 277 F.2d 335 (1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 863, 81 S.Ct. 106, 5 L.Ed.2d 86 (1960); Castle v. United States, 287 F.2d 657, 662 (5 Cir. 1961), reversed on other grounds, 368 U.S. 13, 82 S.Ct ... ...