Catholic Leadership Coal. Texas v. Reisman, 13–50582.

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
Citation764 F.3d 409
Docket NumberNo. 13–50582.,13–50582.
PartiesCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP COALITION OF TEXAS, doing business as Texas Leadership Coalition; Texas Leadership Coalition–Institute for Public Advocacy; Friends of SAFA Texas; Texas Freedom PAC, Plaintiffs–Appellants v. David A. REISMAN, In his official capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Ethics Commission; Hugh C. Akin, In his official capacity as a member of the Texas Ethics Commission; Tom Harrison, In his official capacity as a member of the Texas Ethics Commission; Jim Clancy, In his official capacity as a member of the Texas Ethics Commission; Paul W. Hobby, In his official capacity as a member of the Texas Ethics Commission; Bob Long, In his official capacity as a member of the Texas Ethics Commission; Paula M. Mendoza, In her official capacity as a member of the Texas Ethics Commission; Tom Ramsay, In his official capacity as a member of the Texas Ethics Commission; Chase Untermeyer, In his official capacity as a member of the Texas Ethics Commission; Susan Reed, In her official capacity as District Attorney for Bexar County, Texas, Defendants–Appellees.
Decision Date12 August 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
56 practice notes
  • United States v. Supreme Court of New Mex., s. 14–2037 &amp
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • June 7, 2016
    ...unconstitutional has characteristics of both a facial and as-applied challenge.”); see also Catholic Leadership Coal. of Tex. v. Reisman , 764 F.3d 409, 426 (5th Cir. 2014) (noting that “the precise boundaries of facial and as-applied challenges are somewhat elusive—certain challenges can h......
  • Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, Case No. 1:14-cv-01419 (CRC)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 19, 2016
    ...scrutiny to registration and reporting requirements attending political committee status); Catholic Leadership Coal. of Texas v. Reisman , 764 F.3d 409, 424–25 (5th Cir.2014) (same); 209 F.Supp.3d 92Worley v. Florida Sec'y of State , 717 F.3d 1238, 1243–44 (11th Cir.2013) (same); Human Life......
  • Defense Distributed v. U.S. Dep't of State, 1–15–CV–372 RP.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Western District of Texas
    • August 4, 2015
    ...restraints have applied different standards of review depending on the restraint at issue." Catholic Leadership Coal. of Tex. v. Reisman, 764 F.3d 409, 438 (5th Cir.2014). See, e.g., Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 33, 104 S.Ct. 2199, 81 L.Ed.2d 17 (1984) (order prohibiting dis......
  • Zimmerman v. City of Austin, 16-51366
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • February 1, 2018
    ...limits, temporal limits on contributions are subject to Buckley ’s"closely-drawn" test. See Catholic Leadership Coal. of Tex. v. Reisman , 764 F.3d 409, 432 (5th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, Austin must show (1) that the six-month limit serves the sufficiently important interest of preventing a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
56 cases
  • United States v. Supreme Court of New Mex., s. 14–2037 &amp
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • June 7, 2016
    ...unconstitutional has characteristics of both a facial and as-applied challenge.”); see also Catholic Leadership Coal. of Tex. v. Reisman , 764 F.3d 409, 426 (5th Cir. 2014) (noting that “the precise boundaries of facial and as-applied challenges are somewhat elusive—certain challenges can h......
  • Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, Case No. 1:14-cv-01419 (CRC)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 19, 2016
    ...scrutiny to registration and reporting requirements attending political committee status); Catholic Leadership Coal. of Texas v. Reisman , 764 F.3d 409, 424–25 (5th Cir.2014) (same); 209 F.Supp.3d 92Worley v. Florida Sec'y of State , 717 F.3d 1238, 1243–44 (11th Cir.2013) (same); Human Life......
  • Defense Distributed v. U.S. Dep't of State, 1–15–CV–372 RP.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Western District of Texas
    • August 4, 2015
    ...restraints have applied different standards of review depending on the restraint at issue." Catholic Leadership Coal. of Tex. v. Reisman, 764 F.3d 409, 438 (5th Cir.2014). See, e.g., Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 33, 104 S.Ct. 2199, 81 L.Ed.2d 17 (1984) (order prohibiting dis......
  • Zimmerman v. City of Austin, 16-51366
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • February 1, 2018
    ...limits, temporal limits on contributions are subject to Buckley ’s"closely-drawn" test. See Catholic Leadership Coal. of Tex. v. Reisman , 764 F.3d 409, 432 (5th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, Austin must show (1) that the six-month limit serves the sufficiently important interest of preventing a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT