Catlin v. Moynihan, 10992.
Decision Date | 07 July 1924 |
Docket Number | 10992. |
Citation | 76 Colo. 164,230 P. 1114 |
Parties | CATLIN & CATLIN, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Charles J. MOYNIHAN, Deputy Bank Commissioner, in charge of the Home State Bank, and Charles A. W. Gordon, Defendants in Error. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Nov. 10, 1924.
Department 2.
Error to Montrose County Court; S. S. Sherman, Judge. On application for supersedeas. Supersedeas denied.
Judgment affirmed.
Catlin & Catlin, of Montrose, for plaintiffs in error.
Moynihan, Hughes, Knous & Fauber, of Montrose, for defendants in error.
A verdict for $50 was directed by the court against the plaintiff in error as garnishee. After the evidence was all in and both plaintiff and defendant had rested, each side requested the court to direct a verdict in his favor. We said, in Auto Co. v. Petter, 72 Colo. 570, 212 P. 823, that There was some conflict in the testimony, but there was abundant evidence to justify the finding in favor of plaintiff below. We find no reversible error in the record. Supersedeas denied, judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice ALLEN (sitting for Chief Justice TELLER) and Mr. Justice DENISON concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cowell v. Employers' Indem. Corp.
... ... by the appellate court is whether there is any evidence to ... support the verdict. Catlin v. Moynihan, 76 Colo ... 164; Pearlman v. Snitzer, 112 Neb. 135; De Burg ... v. Armenta, 22 ... ...
-
Cowell v. Indemnity Corporation
...for the court, and the only question for review by the appellate court is whether there is any evidence to support the verdict. Catlin v. Moynihan, 76 Colo. 164; Pearlman v. Snitzer, 112 Neb. 135; De Burg v. Armenta, 22 N.M. 443; Banfield v. Crispen, 111 Ore. 388; Langbehn v. Ins. Co., 41 S......
-
Butts v. Sauve
... ... 823, 72 Colo. 570; Boldt v. Motor ... Securities Co., 218 P. 743, 74 Colo. 55; Catlin v. Moynihan, ... 230 P. 1114, 76 Colo. 164. There was some evidence to support ... a finding that ... ...