Catlin v. Moynihan, 10992.

Decision Date07 July 1924
Docket Number10992.
Citation76 Colo. 164,230 P. 1114
PartiesCATLIN & CATLIN, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Charles J. MOYNIHAN, Deputy Bank Commissioner, in charge of the Home State Bank, and Charles A. W. Gordon, Defendants in Error.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied Nov. 10, 1924.

Department 2.

Error to Montrose County Court; S. S. Sherman, Judge. On application for supersedeas. Supersedeas denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Catlin & Catlin, of Montrose, for plaintiffs in error.

Moynihan, Hughes, Knous & Fauber, of Montrose, for defendants in error.

WHITFORD, J.

A verdict for $50 was directed by the court against the plaintiff in error as garnishee. After the evidence was all in and both plaintiff and defendant had rested, each side requested the court to direct a verdict in his favor. We said, in Auto Co. v. Petter, 72 Colo. 570, 212 P. 823, that 'a request by each party for a directed verdict is equivalent to a stipulation that the facts may be found by the court. The court's finding, thereupon made, is conclusive if there is evidence to support it.' There was some conflict in the testimony, but there was abundant evidence to justify the finding in favor of plaintiff below. We find no reversible error in the record. Supersedeas denied, judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice ALLEN (sitting for Chief Justice TELLER) and Mr. Justice DENISON concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Cowell v. Employers' Indem. Corp.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 20 Diciembre 1930
    ... ... by the appellate court is whether there is any evidence to ... support the verdict. Catlin v. Moynihan, 76 Colo ... 164; Pearlman v. Snitzer, 112 Neb. 135; De Burg ... v. Armenta, 22 ... ...
  • Cowell v. Indemnity Corporation
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 20 Diciembre 1930
    ...for the court, and the only question for review by the appellate court is whether there is any evidence to support the verdict. Catlin v. Moynihan, 76 Colo. 164; Pearlman v. Snitzer, 112 Neb. 135; De Burg v. Armenta, 22 N.M. 443; Banfield v. Crispen, 111 Ore. 388; Langbehn v. Ins. Co., 41 S......
  • Butts v. Sauve
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 29 Marzo 1926
    ... ... 823, 72 Colo. 570; Boldt v. Motor ... Securities Co., 218 P. 743, 74 Colo. 55; Catlin v. Moynihan, ... 230 P. 1114, 76 Colo. 164. There was some evidence to support ... a finding that ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT