Caudill, Rowlett, Scott v. Board of Ed., Union Free School, Dist. Number 3, Towns of North Hempstead and Oyster Bay, Nassau County

Decision Date11 February 1975
PartiesApplication of CAUDILL, ROWLETT, SCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant, for a Judgment Staying the Arbitration Commenced by BOARD OF EDUCATION, UNION FREE SCHOOL, DISTRICT NUMBER 3, TOWNS OF NORTH HEMPSTEAD AND OYSTER BAY, NASSAU COUNTY, New York, Respondent-Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

J. A. Bergadano, New York City, for petitioner-appellant.

J. L. Schapira, New York City, for respondent-respondent.

Before KUPFERMAN, J.P., and MURPHY, LUPIANO and TILZER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 5, 1974 denying petitioner's application to stay arbitration, unanimously reversed on the law, without costs or disbursements and the matter remanded for a hearing on the issue of statute of limitations.

While pursuant to New York law the Court must decide whether claims sought to be arbitrated are barred by limitations of time (Matter of Schlaifer (Kaiser), 46 A.D.2d 850, 361 N.Y.S.2d 183; Matter of Andresen and Co. (Shepard), 45 A.D.2d 578, 360 N.Y.S.2d 36), where the matter is subject to the provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.), that issue is left to the arbitrators. (Matter of Rederi (Dow Chem. Co.),25 N.Y.2d 576, 307 N.Y.S.2d 660, 255 N.E.2d 774; Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Harrisons & Crosfield, 2 Cir., 204 F.2d 366.) However, from this record it cannot be determined whether the contract was one 'evidencing a transaction involving (interstate) commerce', (9 U.S.C. § 2) and accordingly, whether federal or state law is applicable. The matter must therefore be remanded to determine whether the plans themselves were items in interstate commerce and if not, to further develop the facts with relation to the extent of materials ordered in interstate commerce and whether those materials were necessarily procured outside the state pursuant to the architects' plans. (See Laudadio v. White Construction Co., 2 Cir., 163 F.2d 383.)

If it is found that the Federal Arbitration Act is not applicable, and accordingly, that the Court must determine whether the claim is barred by the statute of limitations, the hearing should also encompass the question of when the cause of action arose. While we agree with Special Term that the three year statute is applicable (Siegel v. Kranis, 29 A.D.2d 477, 288 N.Y.S.2d 540), it cannot now be determined whether the cause of action arose in December of 1968 when the plans were accepted...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Paver and Wildfoerster v. Catholic High School Ass'n
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 19, 1976
    ... ... Coleman Catholic High School in Ulster County. On February 21, 1966, the architects agreed ... den. 346 U.S. 854, 74 S.Ct. 69, 98 L.Ed. 368; see, generally, Arbitration-- ... the Statute of Limitations (see Matter of Caudill, Rowlett, Scott (Board of Educ.), 47 A.D.2d 610, ... 621; see Board of Educ. of Cent. School Dist. No. 1 v. Mancuso Bros., 25 Misc.2d 122, 123, 204 ... ...
  • PaineWebber Inc. v. Bybyk
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • April 19, 1996
    ... ... , the Municipal Securities Rule Making Board. Such arbitration shall be governed by the rules ... McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 107 S.Ct. 2332, 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987) ... The motion to dismiss is ... and arbitrability for the courts, see County of Rockland v. Primiano Constr. Co., 51 N.Y.2d ... Page 1203 ... free to structure their arbitration agreements as they ... Catholic High School Ass'n, 38 N.Y.2d 669, 674, 382 N.Y.S.2d 22, 345 .E.2d 565 (1976); Caudill, Rowlett, Scott v. Board of Educ., 47 A.D.2d 610, ... ...
  • Steiner v. Wenning
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 12, 1976
    ... ... of Paver & Wildfoerster (Catholic High School Assn.), 38 N.Y.2d 669, 382 N.Y.S.2d 22, 345 ... Brocton Cent. School Dist., 50 A.D.2d 142, 376 N.Y.S.2d 300 (4th Dept.), ... Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, enter March 27, 1975, affirmed, without costs ... is a question which has arisen in a number of cases, and in the determination of the matter ... den. 346 U.S. 854, 74 S.Ct. 69, 98 L.Ed. 368; see, generally, ... the Statute of Limitations (see Matter of Caudill, Rowlett, Scott (Board of Educ.), 47 A.D.2d 610, ... ...
  • Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 12, 1976
    ... ... 17, col. 7, Supreme Court, Richmond County). If the service is performed negligently, the ... of Paver & Wildfoerster (Catholic High School Ass'n), 38 N.Y.2d 669, 382 N.Y.S.2d 22, 345 ... ed., pp. 72--73), in the chapter on 'Liability', ... Brocton Cent. School Dist., 50 A.D.2d 142, 376 N.Y.S.2d 300, wherein the ... , it had been applied earlier in Matter of Caudill, Rowlett, Scott (Board of Educ.), 47 A.D.2d 610, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT