Cauhn v. State

Decision Date18 July 1929
PartiesCAUHN et al. v. STATE.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Error to Criminal Court of Record, Hillsborough County; W. Raleigh Petteway, Judge.

Neoma Cauhn, alias Jane Doe, alias Naomi Kuhn, and others were convicted of an offense, and they bring error.

Writ of error quashed, and cause remanded.

Syllabus by the Court

SYLLABUS

Where sentence was not on judgment of conviction announced by court, sentence was void. Where sentence was not on a judgment of conviction announced by court, sentence was void.

Where no judgment of conviction appeared in record, writ of error must be quashed and cause remanded. Writ of error must be quashed and cause remanded, where there appeared in record no judgment of conviction.

COUNSEL

Edwin R. Dickenson and Zewadski & Pierce, all of Tampa, for plaintiffs in error.

Fred H. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Roy Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

OPINION

BUFORD, J.

In this case it becomes necessary for us to quash the writ of error and remand the cause because there appears in the record no judgment of conviction.

The defendants were tried upon an information filed in the criminal court of record in and for Hillsborough county. They were convicted by the jury, and were sentenced to serve five years each in the state prison. The sentence was not upon a judgment of conviction pronounced by the court, without which the sentence is void. See Smith v. State, 75 Fla. 468, 78 So. 530; Johnson v. State, 81 Fla. 783, 89 So. 114; Harris v. State, 75 Fla. 527, 78 So. 526; Norwood v. State, 80 Fla. 613, 86 So. 506; Timmons v. State (Fla., decided January, 1929) reported 119 So. 393.

It is therefore the judgment of this court that the writ of error be quashed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Quashed and remanded.

WHITFIELD, P.J., and STRUM, J., concur.

TERRELL, C.J., and ELLIS and BROWN, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgment.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Ellis v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 17, 1930
    ... ... conviction by the jury, using such language as indicated the ... confirmation of adoption or approval of such verdict by the ... court. See Timmons v. State, 97 Fla. 23, 119 So ... 393, and cases therein cited; also State v. Blitch, ... 97 Fla. 260, 120 So. 355; Cauhn v. State (Fla.) 122 ... So. 565; Brown v. State (Fla.) 123 So. 736. It is ... true, the record of the proceedings in the court of crimes ... showed that, although not mentioned in the judgment entry, a ... verdict had been rendered finding the defendant guilty ... 'as charged in the second ... ...
  • Anderson v. Chapman
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • March 13, 1933
    ...A. L. R. 783. And such a sentence, being void, will not support a writ of error, which, if issued thereon, will be quashed. Cauhn v. State, 98 Fla. 185, 122 So. 565. Burns v. State, supra, a sentence reading as follows: 'It is the sentence of the law and the judgment of the court that you, ......
  • Nelson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • May 6, 1930
    ... ... Lavatiatta, while they, the said defendants, were armed with ... a dangerous weapon; and each was sentenced to three years in ... state prison. Naomi Kuhn, one of the defendants, procured a ... separate appeal, and, the judgment being defective, writ of ... error was dismissed. Cauhn, alias Kauhn v. State ... (Fla.) 122 So. 565 ... The ... separate appeal of Arden Kuhn from an order of the trial ... court denying a writ of coram nobis was dismissed upon the ... ground that the judgment of conviction was invalid and ... petitioner had other remedies. Kuhn v ... ...
  • Maniscalco v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • September 25, 1929
    ...of the guilt of the defendant. Johnson v. State, 81 Fla. 783, 89 So. 114, and cases cited; Timmons v. State (Fla.) 119 So. 393; Caughn v. State (Fla.) 122 So. 565. As indicated the cases cited, a so-called judgment, which contains no adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT